摘要
论文是对实践存在论美学的再度评议。它从上世纪90年代末形成之初,就出现了一些问题,但在以后的发展中并未得到解决,继续表现为:在方法上,不是面向美的本身,而是从经典文本找根据,而且作了过度诠释和曲解;其理论基础,则是实践论和实为生存论的存在论的杂揉,并执迷于本体之立,显得动摇不实;因此实践存在论美学宣称的“美学革命”实质是空洞无物的。最后附带简述了存在美学有关美的存在的观点。
This paper is the second commentary on Practical Existentialism Aesthetics because some existed problems about it have not been solved up to now since its first appearance in the late 1990s,and continue to be expressed as follows:in terms of research methodology,they are not oriented to beauty itself,but to classic texts,that are over-interpreted and misinterpreted.Furthermore,its philosophical basis is a mixture of Marx’s practical theory and Ontology(in fact,Existentialism),which appears to be untrue and unstable.Hence the so-called"aesthetic revolution"declared by the Practical Existentialism Aesthetics is devoid of content.The last part of the paper remarks in brief the viewpoints of beauty-being from Ontological Aesthetics.
作者
张弘
ZHANG Hong(Chinese Department,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处
《徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版)》
2021年第4期53-69,共17页
Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词
再评
实践存在论美学
美的存在
现象
re-commentary
Practical Existentialism Aesthetics
beauty-being
phenomena