期刊文献+

有关密怀地区原四合堂群地质体认识的商榷

Discussion on understanding the geological body of former Sihetang Group in Mihuai area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有学者认为,密怀地区四合堂群层状地质体(表壳岩和铁矿)因受韧性剪切带的剪切作用,变成了一个夹构造残留体的巨大岩浆杂岩体。铁矿体因被剪断、位移、丢失,以至造成矿产的巨大损失,从而影响矿床的工业评价。以铁矿、杂岩体、地层、混合岩化、块状无序的变质岩等为研究重点,多数单位认为,该区可划分出两块面型分布的表壳岩。铁矿勘探,全区获得了十亿吨储量,成果丰硕。四合堂群的铁矿虽然厚度不大,但没有发生被剪切带剪断而丢失的情况,大多数铁矿都稳定的向下延伸了几百米。以事实为据,勘探队认为,对该争议地质体的认识,称岩浆杂岩体不合适,它仍应保留原来的提法,即:四合堂群层状地质体。 Some scholars believe that due to the shear action of ductile shear zone,the layered geological body(surface crust rock and iron ore)of the Sihetang Group in Mihuai area has become a huge magmatic complex intercalated with structural residual body(or structural barrier body).As a result,the iron ore body is displaced and lost due to shearing,resulting in huge loss of mineral reserves,thus affecting the industrial evaluation of the deposit.This paper carries out a comprehensive geological research,focusing on iron ore,complex,stratum,migmatitization and massive disordered metamorphic rocks.The results show that the majority belief is that this area can be divided into two large surface-type distributed surface crust rocks.Iron ore exploration in the whole region has uncovered 1 billion tons of reserves.Although the ore body in the Sihetang Group is not thick,most of the iron ores extends steadily downward for hundreds of meters without much loss due to shear actions.Based on the facts,it is considered that the magmatic complex is not suitable to call this controversial geological body magmatic complex.It should still retain the original name,i.e.,the layered geological body of the Sihetang Group.
作者 卢惠华 李修平 郝河 LU Huihua;LI Xiuping;HAO He(Beijing Institute of Geological Engineering Design,Beijing 100195,China)
出处 《城市地质》 2021年第3期354-360,共7页 Urban Geology
关键词 韧性剪切带 岩浆杂岩体 四合堂群 层状地质体 铁矿 密怀隆起 ductile shear zone magmatic complex Sihetang Group layered geological body iron ore Mihuai Uplift
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1沈其韩,耿元生,杨崇辉,王新社,吴春明.我国早前寒武纪地层研究的主要新进展[J].地层学杂志,2004,28(4):289-296. 被引量:16
  • 2贺高品,叶慧文,夏胜利.北京密云地区变质基性岩墙的Sm—Nd同位素年龄及其地质意义[J].岩石学报,1993,9(3):312-317. 被引量:16
  • 3乔广生,翟明国,阎月华.鞍山地区太古代岩石同位素地质年代学研究[J].地质科学,1990,25(2):158-165. 被引量:37
  • 4[54]Cawood P A, Wilde S A, Wang K Y, & Nemchin A A. 1998. Integrated geochronology and field constraints on subdivision of Precambrian in China: data from the Wutaishan. Chinese Science Bulletin, 43(Supp): 17.
  • 5[55]Guan H & Sun M. 1998, Geochronological constraints on formation of the Fuping Complex. Chinese Science Bulletin, 43 (Supp):48.
  • 6[56]Song Biao, Nutman A P, Liu Dun-yi,& Wu Jia-shan. 1996. 3800 to 2500 Ma crustal evolution in the Anshan area of Liaoning Province, northern China. Precambrian Research, 78: 79- 94.
  • 7[57]Sun M, Armstrong R L, & St J Lambert R. 1992. Petrochemistry and Sr. Pb and isotopic geochemistry of early Precambrian rocks, Wutaishan and Taihangshan areas, China. Precambrian Research, 56: 1-31.
  • 8[58]Wan Yu-sheng, Zhang Zong-qing, Wu Jia-shan, Song Biao, & Liu Dun-yi. 1997. Geochemical and Nd isotopic characteristic of some rocks from the Paleoarchean Chentaigou supracsustal,Anshan area, NE China. Continental Dynamics, 2 (1): 39- 46.
  • 9[59]Wilde S A, Cawood P A, Wang K Y, & Nemchin A A. 1998.SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of granites and gneisses in the Taihangshan-Wutaishan area: implication for the timing of crustal growth in the North China Craton. Chinese Science Bulletin, 43(Supp): 144.
  • 10[60]Zhao G C, Wilde S A, Cawood P A, & Sun M. 2002. SHRIMP UPb zircon ages of the Fuping Complex:implications for late Archaean to Paleoproterozoic accretion and assembly of the North China Craton. American Journal of Science ,302( 3 ) : 191 - 226.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部