期刊文献+

基于大数据时代的科教评价发展进程研究 被引量:5

Research on the Development Process of Science and Education Evaluation Based on the Era of Big Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]大数据时代,人们既有的思维定式和工作习惯在潜移默化中革新,科教评价的发展也在大数据背景下随之更改。科教评价对国家科教战略决策的制定、科技教育方向的指导以及学科专业成果的评估等方面都有着非常重要的作用。[方法/过程]文章通过CiteSpace软件对该领域进行可视化分析,并梳理已有研究得出发展进程的演化等相关结论。[结果/结论]大数据时代下科教评价的发展之路仍然面临着评价理论与方法、评价体系构建、应用研究范围等问题。未来需要将科教评价充分结合大数据时代背景,利用大数据技术的优势推动科教评价有条不紊地发展。 [Purpose/significance]With the advent of the era of big data,people’s existing thinking patterns and work habits have been changed imperceptibly,and the development of science and education evaluation has also changed in the context of big data.Science and education evaluation plays a very important role in the formulation of national science and education strategic decision,the guidance of science and technology education direction,and the evaluation of discipline and professional achievements.[Method/process]In this paper,CiteSpace is used to analyze the visualization of the field and sort out the existing research,and the evolution of the development process and other related conclusions are obtained.[Result/conclusion]In the era of big data,the development of science and education evaluation is still facing the problems of evaluation theory and method,evaluation system construction,application research scope and so on.In the future,we need to fully combine the science and education evaluation with the background of big data era,and use the advantages of big data technology to promote the orderly development of science and education evaluation.
作者 邱均平 赵艺翔 Qiu Junping
出处 《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第9期8-13,42,共7页 Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于大数据的科教评价信息云平台构建和智能服务研究”的成果,项目编号:19ZDA348。
关键词 大数据 科教评价 可视化分析 发展进程 big data evaluation of science and education visual analysis development process
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献154

  • 1于维栋.科教兴国:中国社会主义现代化的战略选择[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,14(2):3-13. 被引量:2
  • 2叶继元.引文法既是定量又是定性的评价法[J].图书馆,2005(1):43-45. 被引量:47
  • 3胡明铭,黄菊芳.同行评议研究综述[J].中国科学基金,2005,19(4):251-253. 被引量:70
  • 4郭碧坚.科技管理中的同行评议:本质、作用、局限、替代[J].科技管理研究,1995,15(4):8-12. 被引量:21
  • 5Taraborelli D. ft peer review. Social software and distributed scientific evaluation [ EB/OL ] . [ 2011-12-9 ] . http:// eprints, ucl. ac. uk/8279/.
  • 6Editor from Nature. Quality and value: Models of quality control for scientific research [ EB/OL]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http://www, nature, com/nature/peerreview/debate/ nature05031, html.
  • 7Priem J, Hemminger B M. Scientometrics 2. 0 : Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http ://www. uic. edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin,/ ojs/index, php/fm/article/viewArticle/2874/2570.
  • 8Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Air-metrics : A manifesto[ EB/OL]. [2011-12-9]. http://altmetrics. org/manifesto.
  • 9Jensen M. Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars? [EB/ OL]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http://utpjoumals, metapress, com/ content/14132v164q747147/.
  • 10Patterson M. Article-level metrics at PLoS-addition of usage data[ EB/OL]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http://blogs, plos org/plos/2OO9/O9/article-level-metfics-at-plos-addition- of-usage-data/.

共引文献447

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部