期刊文献+

腰硬复合镇痛分娩联合气囊仿生助产在初产妇阴道分娩中的临床观察 被引量:3

Clinical observation of painless delivery with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and balloon bionic midwifery in primipara’s vaginal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察腰硬复合镇痛分娩联合气囊仿生助产在初产妇阴道分娩中的临床效果。方法将收治600例行阴道分娩的初产妇,采取随机数字法分成对照组与观察组各300例,其中对照组患者采取腰硬复合镇痛分娩,而观察组患者在腰硬复合镇痛分娩的基础上联合使用气囊仿生助产。比较两组产妇不同产程疼痛VAS评分、产程所用时长,分娩结果(无创阴道分娩、会阴裂伤/侧切后经阴道分娩、中转剖宫产),产时、产后2 h总出血量,产后尿潴留、胎儿窘迫发生率、新生儿窒息率。结果观察组初产妇不同产程疼痛VAS评分均低于对照组初产妇(P<0.001)。观察组初产妇第一、二产程及总产程时间明显短于对照组初产妇(P<0.001)。观察组初产妇无创阴道分娩率为82.33%,对照组为62.33%,观察组初产妇无创阴道分娩率高于对照组(P<0.001);观察组初产妇会阴裂伤/侧切后经阴道分娩率为10.00%,转剖宫产率为7.67%,对照组初产妇会阴裂伤/侧切后经阴道分娩率为23.33%,转剖宫产率为14.33%,观察组初产妇会阴裂伤/侧切后经阴道分娩率、转剖宫产率均低于对照组(P<0.01)。观察组初产妇产时出血量、产后2 h总出血量均少于对照组产妇(P<0.001),产后尿潴留、胎儿窘迫与新生儿窒息总发生率低于对照组产妇(P<0.01)。结论在初产妇行阴道分娩中,采取腰硬复合镇痛分娩联合气囊仿生助产技术,可明显减轻产妇在分娩生产过程中的疼痛,缩短分娩产程,增加无创阴道分娩率,减少会阴裂伤及会阴侧切率,减少产后出血量,改善分娩结局,促进自然分娩,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia and balloon bionic midwifery in vaginal delivery of primipara.Methods 600 primiparas who underwent vaginal delivery were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 300 cases in each group.The control group were given combined spinal-epidural analgesia,while the observation group were given balloon bionic midwifery on the basis of combined spinal-epidural analgesia.And then,the VAS score,duration of labor,delivery outcomes(noninvasive vaginal delivery,vaginal delivery and conversion to cesarean section after perineal laceration/lateral incision)of the two groups as well as total bleeding volume during delivery and 2 h after delivery,postpartum urinary retention,fetal distress rate,and neonatal asphyxia rate were compared between the two groups.Results The VAS scores of primipara in different stages of labor in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.001).The time of the first,the second and total stages of labor in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P<0.001).The rate of non-invasive vaginal delivery in the observation group was 82.33%,and that of the control group was 62.33%,and that of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.001).The rates of vaginal delivery and conversion to cesarean section after perineal laceration/lateral incision in the observation group were 10.00%and 7.67%,respectively,and those in the control group were 23.33%and 14.33%,respectively,the rates of vaginal delivery and conversion to cesarean section after perineal laceration/lateral incision in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.01).The amount of bleeding during delivery and 2 hours after delivery in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.001),and the total incidence of urinary retention,fetal distress and neonatal asphyxia in was lower than that in the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion In the vaginal delivery of primiparas,combined spinal-epidural analgesia and balloon bionic midwifery technology can significantly relieve the pain in the process of delivery,shorten the delivery process,increase the rate of non-invasive vaginal delivery,lower perineal laceration and lateral incision rate,reduce the amount of postpartum hemorrhage,improve delivery outcome and promote natural delivery,which is worthy of clinical application.
作者 刘伟武 周树强 黄宗强 钟剑 曾伟兰 徐秀英 肖海燕 LIU Weiwu;ZHOU Shuqiang;HUANG Zongqiang;ZHONG Jian;ZENG Weilan;XU Xiuying;XIAO Haiyan(Department of Obstetrics,Yulin Maternal and Child Health Center,Yulin 537000,Guangxi,China;Department of Anesthesiology,Yulin Maternal and Child Health Center,Yulin 537000,Guangxi,China)
出处 《右江医学》 2021年第8期588-592,共5页 Chinese Youjiang Medical Journal
基金 玉林市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(玉市科20202914)。
关键词 腰硬复合镇痛分娩 气囊仿生助产 初产妇 阴道分娩 combined spinal-epidural analgesia balloon bionic midwifery primipara vaginal delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献107

  • 1漆洪波.头位难产的识别及处理[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(5):264-267. 被引量:62
  • 2范玲,吴连方.产妇分娩期的生理及心理特点[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(5):276-278. 被引量:99
  • 3田扬顺.气囊助产术[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:52.
  • 4孙光彩.气囊助产在头位难产中的临床应用价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(32):4621-4622. 被引量:9
  • 5Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Gelisen O,et al. Unsuccessful labor induction in women with unfavorable cervical scores:predictors and manage- ment[J]. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol,2004,44(6) :562 -567.
  • 6Kandil M, Ema.rh M ,Sayyed T,et al. Foley catheter versus intra-va- ginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations[ J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2013,286 ( 2 ) :303 - 307.
  • 7田扬顺.气囊仿生助产临床应用价值[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2008:138-144.
  • 8谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].笫8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:211-213.
  • 9Ma J, Shao H, Lu X,et al. Safety and efficacy of airbag midwifery in promoting normal vaginal delivery and reducing caesarean section [J]. Iran J Reprod Med,2012,10(6) :595 -600.
  • 10Deepak Gupta.??Electrohysterography may be integral to remifentanil Labor analgesia(J)Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine . 2012 (2)

共引文献253

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部