期刊文献+

土壤气监测在污染地块调查评估中的优势、局限及解决思路 被引量:12

Soil gas monitoring for site investigation and risk assessment:Advantages,challenges and solutions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前,我国污染地块调查评估以土壤监测为主,辅以地下水监测。这套方法对于挥发性有机物(VOCs)的特殊性考虑不足,可能出现遗漏污染区域的可能性。与土壤监测相比,土壤气监测在VOCs污染地块调查评估中具有可捕捉VOCs污染区域的能力更强,能更准确反映VOCs的气态扩散迁移过程和呼吸暴露风险,以及长期监测成本较低等优势,故有必要将土壤气监测作为VOCs污染地块调查评估的常规工作内容。针对土壤气监测在国内推广应用中仍受到缺乏土壤气采样技术规范、分析检测标准方法、土壤气环境质量标准或风险筛选值及相应的数据分析方法等问题的局限,提出相应的解决思路以供参考。 Current contaminated site investigation and risk assessment in China rely on soil monitoring,supplemented by groundwater monitoring.However,this method neglects the specificity of volatile organic compounds(VOCs)thus might miss some contaminated zones.In contrast to soil monitoring,soil gas monitoring has the following three advantages:(1)more capable of capturing highly contaminated zones by VOCs,(2)more effective in reflecting gas-phase diffusive transport and human respiratory exposure risk,and(3)less expensive for long term monitoring.Therefore,soil gas monitoring should be part of normal site investigation and risk assessment for VOC-impacted sites.However,there are four challenges associated with the application of soil gas monitoring in China:(1)lack of technical guidelines for soil gas sampling,(2)lack of standard analytical methods for soil gas VOCs at contaminated sites,(3)lack of environmental quality standard or risk control screening values of soil gas and(4)lack of analytical methods of soil gas monitoring data.Solutions to overcome these challenges are provided in this paper.
作者 马杰 MA Jie(State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing,College of Chemical Engineering and Environment,China University of Petroleum-Beijing,Beijing 102249,China)
出处 《环境工程学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第8期2531-2535,共5页 Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(21878332) 北京市科技新星计划项目(Z181100006218088) 中石油科技创新基金资助项目(2018D-5007-0607)。
关键词 污染场地 地块调查 风险评估 土壤气 挥发性有机物 土壤 地下水 contaminated site site investigation risk assessment soil gas volatile organic compounds soil groundwater
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1LIU Zhi-quan ZHANG Ying-hua LI Guang-he ZHANG Xu.Sensitivity of key factors and uncertainties in health risk assessment of benzene pollutant[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2007,19(10):1272-1280. 被引量:8
  • 2北京市环境保护科学研究院.DB11/T656-2009场地环境评价导则[S].北京:北京市质量技术监督局,2009.
  • 3US EPA. EPA/540/1-89/002 risk assessment guidance for superfund: human health evaluation manual [ S 1 - Washington DC : US EPA, 1989.
  • 4ASTM. E2081-00 Standard guide for risk-based corrective action [ S]. Washington DC : American Society for Testing and Materials, 2004.
  • 5PLWASHANT J M, DIBLEV V. Case study comparisons of vapor inhalation risk estimates: ASTM RBCA model prediction vs specific soil vapor data[ R]. Washington DC: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1997.
  • 6SMITH J A, CHIOU C T, KAMMER J A, et al. Effect of soil moisture on the sorption of trichloroethane vapor to vadose-zone soil at picatinny arsenal, New Jersey [ J]. Environ Sci Technol, 1990, 24(5 ) :676-683.
  • 7JOHN A M, EDWARD W F. A comparison of surface emission flux chamber measurements to modeled emissions from subsurface contamination [ OL/EB ]. 2013 [ 2013- 06- 20 ]. http ://info. ngwa. org/gwol/pdf/031977548, pdf.
  • 8PAUL C J, MARIUSH W K, RICHARD L J. Assessing the significance of subsurface contaminant vapor migration to enclosed space[ R]. Washington DC: Health and Environmental Science Department, 1998 : 1.
  • 9CHEN W, KAN A T, NEWELL C J, et al. More realistic soil cleanup standards with dual-equilibrium desorption [ J ].Groundwater, 2002,40 ( 2 ) : 153-164.
  • 10KIM D J, CHOI N C, KIM S B. Quantification of irreversible benzene sorption in sandy materials [ J ]. Hydrological Process, 2004,18 ( 17 ) :3229-3234.

共引文献47

同被引文献87

引证文献12

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部