期刊文献+

在对话中寻求教育学与人类学的融合——基于1954年斯坦福会议

Seeking the Integration of Education and Anthropology through Discussion:Based on Stanford Conference in 1954
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论文围绕教育学学者与人类学学者在斯坦福会议上的对话,通过对话来寻求两个学科的融合。一些教育学学者注意到教育理论与文化实践是相互依存的,人类学学者在研究不同社会与文化中积累了大量的田野资料,并认识到文化人类学的理论、概念和方法能够为教育理论和实践提供一个有效的参考框架,来共同研究教育领域出现的问题,寻求解决方法与答案。两个学科的学者都意识到学科融合的重要性,即:可以通过对话寻求两个领域在理论上的结合点;寻求将教育过程置于社会文化背景中的必要性;寻求教育与生命周期的关系;寻求跨文化的理解与学习;寻求将人类学作为教师教育基本学科的重要性。其融合途径对我国教育人类学的发展具有启示意义。 This paper focuses on the discussion between scholars of education and anthropology at Stanford Conference,and seeks the integration of the two disciplines through discussion.Some educational scholars have noticed that educational theory and cultural practice are interdependent.Anthropologists have accumulated a lot of field work data in the study of different societies and cultures,and realized that the theories,concepts and methods of cultural anthropology can provide an effective reference framework for educational theory and practice,also jointly study the problems in the field of education to seek solutions and answers.Scholars of both disciplines are aware of the importance of disciplinary integration,that is,they can seek the theoretical combination of the two fields through discussion;the necessity of putting the educational process in the social and cultural background;the relationship between education and life cycle;cross-cultural understanding and learning;the importance of making anthropology as a basic subject of teacher education.The way of integration is of great significance to the development of educational anthropology in China.
作者 樊秀丽 张楚玥 FAN Xiu-li;ZHANG Chu-yue(College of Education,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048,China)
出处 《贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2021年第5期38-46,共9页 Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“农民工随迁子女文化融合教育的人类学研究”(15BSH062)的后续成果。
关键词 对话 教育学 人类学 融合 斯坦福会议 discussion education anthropology integration Stanford Conference
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1冯增俊.教育人类学未来发展展望[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006(2):98-103. 被引量:20
  • 2滕星.回顾与展望:中国教育人类学发展历程——兼谈与教育社会学的比较[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,26(5):5-12. 被引量:37
  • 3江淵一公.アメリカにぉける教育人類学の成立過程に関する研究(その1)[J].九州大学教育学部附属比較教育文化研究施設紀要,1995,46:17-18.
  • 4江淵一公.G.スピンドラ-と L.スピンドラ-文化変容·教育の人類学[M]//綾部恒雄.文化人類学群像2:外国编②.日本:アカデミア出版会,1988:199.
  • 5江淵一公.教育人類学[M]//祖父江孝男.現代の文化人類学(現代のェスプリ別冊).日本:至文堂,1982:143.
  • 6Oghu, J. U. Anthropology of Education [M]//In: Husen, T. & Postlethwaite , T. N. (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Education. Vol. 1, 1985.
  • 7Council on Anthropology and Education[J]. Newsletter, Vol. 1, May, 1970.
  • 8Anthropology & Education Quarterly[J].Vol. 38, Number. 1, March, 2007.
  • 9Valentine, Charles A. , Culture and Poverty:Critique and Counter Proposals[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1968.
  • 10Eddy, E. M. , Theory, Research and Application in Educational Anthropology[J]. Anthropology and Education Quarterly. 1985, Vol. 16 : 84.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部