期刊文献+

毒死蜱、二嗪磷等6种农药对鸟类的环境风险评估 被引量:1

Avain Risk Assessment of Six Pesticides Including Chlorpyrifos,Diazinon
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用现有的评估方法,对毒死蜱、二嗪磷、乐果、吡虫啉、抗蚜威和灭多威6种农药对鸟类的风险进行评估,评估结果表明,经食途径,乐果、毒死蜱和二嗪磷对鸟类的初级急性、短期和长期风险均不可接受;吡虫啉对鸟类的初级急性和长期风险不可接受;抗蚜威和灭多威对鸟类的初级急性风险不可接受,对鸟类的初级短期和长期风险可接受。通过饮水途径,只有毒死蜱对鸟类的急性风险无需关注,其他农药品种对鸟类的急、慢性风险均需关注。吡虫啉、毒死蜱、二嗪磷和灭多威4种农药通过喷雾液滴吸入途径对鸟类产生的风险需要引起关注,乐果和抗蚜威通过喷雾液滴吸入途径对鸟类产生的风险无需关注;6种农药通过挥发相吸入途径对鸟类产生的风险均无需关注。评估结果可为6种农药的安全使用和的环境安全管理提供科学参考,同时对我国现有评估指南的完善提出了建议。 The risks of six pesticides(chlorpyrifos,diazinon,dimethoate,imidacloprid,pirimicarb and methomyl)to birds were assessed using the existing assessment methods.The results showed that through exposure route of dietary,the primary acute,short-term and long-term risks of dimethoate,chlorpyrifos and diazinon to birds were unacceptable;the primary acute and long-term risks of imidacloprid to birds were unacceptable;the primary acute risks of pirimicarb and methomyl to birds were unacceptable,and the primary short-term and long-term risks of pirimicarb and methomyl to birds were acceptable.Through exposure route of drinking water,the risk of chlorpyrifos to birds was acceptable,and the risks of other five pesticides to birds were worthy of concern.Through exposure route of spray droplet inhalation,the risks of dimethoate and pirimicarb to birds were acceptable,and the risks of imidacloprid,chlorpyrifos,diazinon and methomyl to birds were worthy of concern.Through exposure route of vapor phase inhalation,the risks of all the six pesticides to birds were acceptable.The assessment results could provide scientific reference for the safe use and the environmental safety management of these pesticides.Meanwhile,suggestions for improvement of the existing assessment guideline in China were put forward at the end of this paper.
作者 程燕 闫新利 周军英 谭丽超 杨小锋 卜元卿 单正军 Cheng Yan;Yan Xinli;Zhou Junying;Tan Lichao;Yang Xiaofeng;Bu Yuanqing;Shan Zhengjun(Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science,Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Nanjing 210042,China)
出处 《生态毒理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第3期273-279,共7页 Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
关键词 农药 鸟类 环境风险评估 经食途径 饮水途径 吸入途径 pesticides avian environmental risk assessment dietary route drinking water route inhalation route
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1程燕,周军英,单正军,陈建群.国内外农药生态风险评价研究综述[J].农村生态环境,2005,21(3):62-66. 被引量:18
  • 2陈辉,刘劲松,曹宇,李双成,欧阳华.生态风险评价研究进展[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1558-1566. 被引量:142
  • 3阳文锐,王如松,黄锦楼,李锋,陈展.生态风险评价及研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(8):1869-1876. 被引量:120
  • 4U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Ecolog- ical Risk Assessment[ R]. Risk Assessment Forum, Washing- ton, DC, EPA63(93):26846- 26924, 14 - May -1998.
  • 5Water models [ EB/OL]. http://www, epa. gov / oppefedl / models/water / index, htm,2004 - 10 - 15.
  • 6OECD Environment Health and Safety Publications Series on Pesticides ( No. 25 ), The Assessment of Persistency and Bioac- cumulation in the Pesticide Registration Frameworks within the OECD Region[ R]. ENV/JM/MONO (2005)2, 2005 -01 - 31.
  • 7OECD "s datebase on chemical risk assessment models [ EB/ OL]. http://webdominol, oecd. org / comnet / env / models. Nsf, 2004 - 10 - 15.
  • 8U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Fo- rum,Guidelines for Exposure Assessment [ R ]. EPA / 600/ Z-92/001, 1992 -05.
  • 9Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods (ECOFRAM). Aquatic Report[R]. Washington, DC, USA, 1999 - 04 - 05.
  • 10The Center for Ethics and Toxics. Smith River Flood Plain Pes- ticide Aquatic Ecological Exposure Assessment[M]. The Smith River Project 2002.

共引文献1

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部