期刊文献+

Considerations for the Conduction and Interpretation of FAIRness Evaluations 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 The FAIR principles were received with broad acceptance in several scientific communities.However,there is still some degree of uncertainty on how they should be implemented.Several self-report questionnaires have been proposed to assess the implementation of the FAIR principles.Moreover,the FAIRmetrics group released 14,general-purpose maturity for representing FAIRness.Initially,these metrics were conducted as open-answer questionnaires.Recently,these metrics have been implemented into a software that can automatically harvest metadata from metadata providers and generate a principle-specific FAIRness evaluation.With so many different approaches for FAIRness evaluations,we believe that further clarification on their limitations and advantages,as well as on their interpretation and interplay should be considered.
出处 《Data Intelligence》 2020年第1期285-292,共8页 数据智能(英文)
基金 M.Dumontier was supported by grants from NWO(400.17.605 628.011.011) NIH(3OT3TR002027-01S1 1OT3OD025467-01 1OT3OD025464-01) H2020-EU EOSClife(824087) ELIXIR,the research infrastructure for life-science data.R.de Miranda Azevedo was supported by grants from H2020-EU EOSClife(824087) ELIXIR,the research infrastructure for life-science data.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部