期刊文献+

掺杂剂不同的重掺硅片的抛光特性 被引量:1

Polishing Characteristics of Heavily Doped Silicon Wafers with Different Dopants
原文传递
导出
摘要 不同掺杂剂种类的重掺硅片有其特性,为了研究不同掺杂剂硅片的固有特性对化学机械抛光结果的影响,选取应用广泛的重掺硼、重掺砷、重掺锑3种硅片进行抛光加工,并在抛光后进行清洗。实验中保持抛光时间相同,抛光液及抛光垫状态一致,使得抛光结果的差异性与抛光时间、抛光压力、转速等抛光工艺参数无关。通过研究重掺硼、重掺砷、重掺锑3种硅片在抛光过程中的去除速率、Haze值和抛光后的表面微粗糙度,反映掺杂剂种类的不同对抛光结果的影响。实验结果显示重掺硼硅片的抛光去除速率明显低于重掺砷和重掺锑硅片,重掺砷硅片的抛光去除速率高于重掺锑和重掺硼硅片;抛光后重掺硼硅片的Haze值最大,重掺砷和重掺锑硅片的Haze值较小,间接反映抛光后重掺硼硅片的表面微粗糙度整体高于重掺砷和重掺锑硅片;白光干涉测试显示,重掺硼硅片的表面微粗糙度中心低边缘高;重掺砷硅片的边缘表面微粗糙度明显高于中心;重掺锑硅片的表面微粗糙度中心至边缘保持一致。 Nowadays,with the rapid development of information technology,the requirements for the manufacturing of large-scale integrated circuits(IC)on the substrate silicon wafer were becoming important. In order to improve the overall performance of IC,wafer processing technology in the silicon wafer surface state,microscopic flatness and other aspects of the requirements had reached in the nanometer level. Chemical mechanical polishing(CMP)was the final leveling process for the surface of the silicon wafer in the processing link of the substrate. In the polishing process,the surface of the silicon wafer would be subjected to the grinding effect of the micro particles in the slurry and the corrosion effect of the slurry at the same time. Under the alternating action of mechanical and chemical aspects,the ultra-precision flat surface processing was realized. However,many parameter variables in CMP technology,such as polishing fluid,polishing pressure,polishing speed and polishing time,would affect the polishing effect. Therefore,in this paper,CMP polishing experiments were carried out on three kinds of heavily doped silicon wafers with different dopants to analyze the influence of different dopants on the polishing removal rate and the surface micro-roughness after polishing. A single-sided CMP polishing machine was used to polish silicon wafers and 54 silicon wafers doped with boron,arsenic and antimony with crystal direction <100>and diameter of 150 mm were selected. KOH polishing solution and SiO_(2) abrasive were used. Each silicon wafer had 18 pieces. In the polishing process,the pressure head pressurized the ceramic plate,and then the silicon wafer was pressurized on the rotating polishing pad. At the same time,the polishing fluid was added to make the mechanical action and chemical action took place simultaneously.Each group of wafers went through three polishing processes,in which the roughing time was 8 min. After finishing the polishing,all the silicon wafers were cleaned by the cleaning tank,and the residual polishing fluid on the surface was removed for testing and analysis. This experiment focused on the influence of different dopant types on the polishing removal rate and the difference of the surface roughness and surface state of silicon wafers with different dopant types after full polishing. ADE9600 equipment was used to measure the thickness of silicon wafer before and after polishing,and the polishing removal rate of silicon wafer was calculated. The Haze value of the polished wafer was detected by KAL Tensor SP1 particle detection equipment. Two pieces of each silicon wafer were randomly selected,and the surface roughness and surface morphology were measured by white light interferometer. Analyzed the experimental data and got the results that the polishing removal rate of heavily boron-doped silicon wafer was the smallest,and the polishing removal rate of heavily arsenic-doped silicon wafer was the highest. After polishing,Haze value of heavily boron-doped silicon wafer was the largest,while Haze value of heavily arsenic-doped and heavily antimony-doped silicon wafer was small. It indirectly reflected that the surface micro-roughness of heavily boron-doped silicon wafer was higher than that of heavily arsenic-doped silicon wafer and heavily antimony-doped silicon wafer as a whole. White light interference test displayed that the surface micro-roughness center of heavily borondoped silicon wafer was low and the edge was high,and the heavily arsenic-doped silicon wafer was obviously higher than that of the center and the heavily doped antimony silicon wafer was consistent from the center to the edge. The conclusions of this experiment were as follows:(1)The polishing removal rate of heavy boron doped silicon was obviously lower than that of heavy arsenic doped and heavy antimony doped silicon.(2)The polishing removal rate of heavy arsenic doped silicon wafer was higher than that of heavy antimony and heavy boron doped silicon wafer.(3)The overall surface roughness of the heavy boron doped silicon wafer was the largest,and the surface morphology of the heavy boron doped silicon wafer was low in the center and high in the edge.(4)The overall surface roughness of the heavy arsenic doped silicon wafer was small,and the surface morphology of the heavy arsenic doped silicon wafer was low in the center and high in the edge.(5)The surface roughness of heavy antimony doped silicon wafer was small,and the surface morphology was relatively smooth. In this study,the experimental variables could be further carefully controlled and the influence of uncertain factors in polishing could be reduced by a large number of repeated experiments. By analyzing the surface state of different silicon wafers after polishing,the process parameters could be obtained to improve the polishing effect of different silicon wafers,which was conducive to improving the product quality in the actual production.
作者 周莹莹 张果虎 周旗钢 史训达 林霖 路一辰 Zhou Yingying;Zhang Guohu;Zhou Qigang;Shi Xunda;Lin Lin;Lu Yichen(General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals,Beijing 100088;GRINM Semiconductor Materials Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100088)
出处 《稀有金属》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第8期1018-1024,共7页 Chinese Journal of Rare Metals
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0305603) 北京市顺义区科技三项费项目(KS201824)资助。
关键词 掺杂剂 重掺硅片 化学机械抛光技术 dopant heavy doped silicon chemical mechanical polishing
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献104

共引文献129

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部