期刊文献+

合作与竞争关系中社会比较对高中生认知信任与情感信任的影响 被引量:3

The Influence of Social Comparison on High School Students’Cognitive and Affective Trust in the Context of Cooperative and Competitive Relationships
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以559名高中生为被试,构建合作与竞争关系,用学业成绩为比较内容,探讨了不同关系中社会比较对认知信任与情感信任的影响。结果发现:(1)在控制组和竞争组,向下比较会损害认知信任;在竞争组,向上比较会损害情感信任;社会比较对合作组中两种信任的影响无显著差异,两种信任均处于较高水平。结果表明对在社会比较中受损的两种信任而言,竞争会进一步增加损害,而合作则能起到保护作用。 This study aimed to investigate the influence of social comparison on senior high school students’cognitive and affective trust in the context of cooperative and competitive relationships.In the present study,the academic achievements of participants and their competitors were considered as the sources of social comparison under the context of cooperation and competition relationships.Five hundred and fifty nine high school students were requested to rate their cognitive and affective trust in the 7-point Likert scale and complete the trust games which measure their trust on behavioral dimension.The results showed that:1)Downward social comparison harmed cognitive trust both in the control group and the competition group,whereas upward comparison harmed affective trust only in the competition group.Moreover,social comparison did not influence the cognitive and affective trust in the context of cooperative relationships.2)Competition further lowered the level of the two trust types which had been damaged in the social comparison,whereas cooperation played a protective role.
作者 邓颜彦 郭成 DENG Yanyan;GUO Cheng(Research Center of Mental Health Education,Faculty of Psychology,Southwest University,Chongqing 400700;Chengdu Tianli Academy,Chengdu 611730)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期556-562,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWU1909106)。
关键词 社会比较 认知信任 情感信任 合作 竞争 social comparison cognitive trust affective trust cooperation competition.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献89

  • 1宋维真.中国人使用明尼苏达多相个性测验表的结果分析[J].心理学报,1985,17(4):346-355. 被引量:96
  • 2陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J].心理学报,1983,15(2):211-218. 被引量:380
  • 3宋维真,张建新,张建平,张妙清,梁觉.编制中国人个性测量表(CPAI)的意义与程序[J].心理学报,1993,25(4):400-407. 被引量:52
  • 4黄希庭 张蜀林.562个人格特质形容词的好恶度、意义度和熟悉度的测定[A]..见:黄希庭心理学文选[C].重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2000.283-311.
  • 5周明洁,张建新.中国人的人际关系性研究.2006(评审中)
  • 6Cattell R B. Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1995, 55:926-937
  • 7Costa P T, McCrae R R. Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 54:853-863
  • 8Kerry L Jang, et al. Heritability of Facet-Level Traits in a Cross-Cultural Twin Sample,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998, 74:1556
  • 9Cloninger C R. A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatry Developments, 1986, 3:167-226
  • 10Stough C, et al. Psychophysiological correlates of the NEOPI-R openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness:preliminary results, Int J Psychophysiol, 2001, 41(1): 87-91

共引文献187

同被引文献69

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部