期刊文献+

玻璃体切除联合内界膜翻转填塞治疗大直径黄斑裂孔

Clinical efficacy of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane tamping for big diameter macular holes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察玻璃体切除联合内界膜翻转填塞治疗直径>500μm的黄斑裂孔(MH)的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年5月本院眼科收治的18例直径>500μm黄斑裂孔患者,均行玻璃体切除联合内界膜翻转填塞术,随访3个月。所有患者均行手术前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)检查,用频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)检查手术前后黄斑区视网膜结构变化,评估裂孔闭合率,比较手术前后BCVA、光感受器内外层缺失直径(DIOA)的变化。结果术后3个月黄斑裂孔闭合率为100%。术后3个月BCVA较术前明显改善。手术前后不同时间的BCVA总体比较差异有统计学意义(F=3.348,P<0.05)。术后1周、1月、3月DIOA较术前减小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论玻璃体切除联合内界膜翻转填塞术治疗大直径黄斑裂孔安全有效,提高裂孔闭合率,有效改善视力。 Objective To observe the effectiveness of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane tamping for macular holes which diameter greater than 500μm.Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted in 18 patients with macular holes from January in 2017 to May in 2020.The patients were followed up for 3 months after vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane tamping.Mesure the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA).Observe the status of closure condition of macular holes.Diameter of inner segment/outer segment(IS/OS)absence(DIOA)before and after surgery were masured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT).Results MH complete closure in 100%eyes(18/18)at 3 months after surgery.BCVA was significantly improved at 3 months after surgery.The differences among various time were significant(F=3.348,P<0.05).DIOA reduced in 1 week,1 month,3 months after surgery,the difference was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Vitrectomy combined with ILM tamping is safe and effective to close big diameter macular holes,increase closure rate of holes and improve vision.
作者 杨瑛 韩永钊 YANG Ying;HAN Yong-zhao(The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,211100,China)
出处 《实用防盲技术》 2021年第3期105-107,117,F0003,共5页 Journal of Practical Preventing Blind
关键词 大直径黄斑裂孔 内界膜填塞 光学相干断层扫描 Big diameter macular hole ILM tamping Optical coherence tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献36

  • 1Ruiz- Moreno JM, Staicu C, Pi:ero DP, et al. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 2008 ;92 ( 5 ) :640-644 2.
  • 2Gass JD. Idiopathic senile macular hole: its early stages and pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106(5) :629-639 3.
  • 3Gass JD. Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages development of a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 1995 ;119(6) :752-759 4.
  • 4Gass JD. MUller cell cone, an overlooked part of the anatomy of the fovea centralis: hypotheses concerning its hole in the pathogenesis of macular hole and foveomacular retinoschisis. Arch Ophthalmol 1999 ; 117 (6) :821-823 5.
  • 5Kwok AK, Li WW, Pang CP, et al. Indocyanine green staining and removal of internal limiting membrane in macolar hole surgery:histology and outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 2001 ; 132 ( 2 ) : 178-183.
  • 6Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991 ; 109 ( 5 ) :654-659 8.
  • 7Mester V, Kuhn F. Internal limiting membrane removal in the management of full-thickness macular holes. Am J Ophthalmo12000 ; 129 (6) :769-777 9.
  • 8Kumagai K, Furukawa M, Ogino N,et al. Incidence and factors related to macular hole reopening. Am J Ophthalmol 2010 ; 149 ( 1 ) : 127-132 1.
  • 9Gupta D, Goldsmith C, Burton RL. Surgery for bilateral macular holes. Eye (Lond) 2009 ;23 ( 3 ) :556-558 11.
  • 10de Bustros S. Vitrectomy for prevention of macular holes. Results of a randomized malticenter clinical trial. Vitrectomy for Prevention of Macular Hole Study Group. Ophthalmology 1994 ; 101 (6) : 1055-1059 12.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部