期刊文献+

人际信任中的面孔吸引力效应研究

A Study on the Effect of Facial Attractiveness in Interpersonal Trust
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人们倾向于将积极的信念、情绪、态度等赋予那些面孔具有吸引力的人,也对这样的人采取积极的行动。然而,在社会互动中,人们既依赖互动对象的外貌特征做出判断和决策,也会观察其行为表现,调整自己的行为模式。基于此,实验采用2(面孔吸引力:高、低)×3(贡献趋势:随机、递增、递减)混合设计,考察面孔吸引力和行为信息对人际信任的交互影响。结果发现,面孔吸引力的直接效应不显著。然而,当同伴的面孔吸引力低(而非高)时,被试在同伴的贡献水平递减时比在同伴的贡献水平递增时对同伴表现出更高的信任水平。 People tend to attach positive beliefs,emotions and attitudes to individuals with attractive faces and take positive actions towards those individuals.However,in social interaction,people not only rely on the physical characteristics of their interactive partners to make their judgments and decisions,but also observe the behavior of their partners and then adjust the pattern of their own behavior.The purpose of the experiment was thus to investigate the effects of facial attractiveness and behavioral information on interpersonal trust.The experiment adopted a mixed experimental design of 2(face attractiveness:high versus low)×3(trend of contribution:random,increasing,versus decreasing).The results showed that the main effect of facial attractiveness was not significant.However,a significant interaction between facial attractiveness and trend of contribution was observed:Participants trusted more in their partners with low(rather than high)facial attractiveness when their level of contribution decreased gradually than when their level of contribution increased gradually.
作者 王叶 刘长江 WANG Ye;LIU Changjiang(School of Psychology,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,China;Department of Normal Education,Meishan Vocational&Technical College,Meishan 620010,China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2021年第9期513-521,共9页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目(编号:2018SJZDI205)资助。
关键词 面孔吸引力 合作 社会互动 人际关系 行为历史 facial attractiveness cooperation social interaction interpersonal relationship behavioral history
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1刘金明,阴国恩.儿童分类发展研究综述[J].心理科学,2001,24(6):707-709. 被引量:4
  • 2胡卫鹏,区永东,时勘.连续性公共物品困境中信息结构对决策行为的影响[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):580-583. 被引量:8
  • 3Au WT., Chen XP., Komorita SS. A probabilistic model of criticality in a sequential public good dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1998,75(3):274-293.
  • 4Daews M. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology,1980,31:169-193.
  • 5Marwell G., Ames R. Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economies, 1981,15:295-310.
  • 6Kollock P. Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation.Annual Review of Sociology, 1998,24:183-214.
  • 7Kopelman S., Weber JM., Messick DM. Common dilemma management: Recent experimental results. The 8th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP) ,2000.
  • 8Goren H., Kurzban R., Rapoport A. Social loafing vs.social enhancement: Public goods provisioning in real-time with irrevocable commitments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,2003,90(2):277-290.
  • 9Chen XP., Au WT., Komorita SS. Sequential choice in a step-level public goods dilemma: The effects of criticality and uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996,65(1):37-47.
  • 10Budescu DV., Au WT., Chen, XP. Effect of protocol of play and social orientation on behavior in sequential resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 1997,69(3):179-193.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部