期刊文献+

IMR对NSTEMI患者左心室重塑的相关性分析 被引量:1

Correlation Between IMR and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with NSTEMI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨冠状动脉微循环阻力指数(IMR)对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者左心室重塑的相关性。【方法】选择2018年1月至2019年1月本院心内科收治的112例NSTEMI患者,根据是患者PCI术后否存在左心室重塑将其分为重塑组(n=23)和非重塑组(n=89)。随访介入术后及出院后12个月,记录两组患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV),比较两组患者心功能,分析IMR与心功能的相关性,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析IMR识别左心室重塑的临床价值。【结果】出院前,两组患者LVEF、LVEDV及LVESV比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后12个月,重塑组患者LVEF低于出院前,LVEDV、LVESV显著高于出院前;重塑组患者LVEF显著低于非重塑组,LVEDV显著高于非重塑组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。重塑组患者IMR为(38.75±6.31)U,显著高于非重塑组(23.47±4.96)U,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,IMR与LVEF呈显著负相关(r=-0.296,P=0.038),与LVEDV及LVESV呈显著正相关(r分别为0.492,0.371,P分别为0.018,0.047)。ROC曲线分析显示,IMR预测NSTEMI患者PCI术后12个月发生左心室重塑价值为(AUC)(95%CI)为0.86(0.79〜0.95)。【结论】IMR是潜在的预测NSTEMI患者预后的指标,临床医师可根据患者IMR及时给予有效治疗措施,对临床改善患者预后具有重要临床意义。 【Objective】To investigate the correlation between coronary microcirculation resistance index(IMR)and left ventricular remodeling in patients with non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTE-MI).【Methods】A total of 112 patients with NSTEMI treated in the Department of Cardiology of our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were-selected.According to whether there was left ventricular remodeling after PCI,they were divided into remodeling group(n=23)and non remodeling group(n=89).12 months after interventional surgery and discharge,the left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end diastolic volume(LVEDV)and left ventricular end systolic volume(LVESV)of the two groups were recorded.The cardiac function of the two groups was compared,the correlation between IMR and cardiac function was analyzed,and the clinical value of IMR in identifying left ventricular remodeling was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curye.【Results】Before discharge,there was no significant difference in LVEF,LVEDV and LVESV between the two groups(P>0.05).12 months after operation,LVEF in the remodeling group was lower than that before discharge,and LVEDV and LVESV were significantly higher than that before discharge;LVEF in the remodeling group was significantly lower than that in the non remodeling group,and LVEDV was significantly higher than that in the non remodeling group(all P<0.05).The IMR of patients in remodeling group was(38.75±6.31)U,which was significantly higher.than that in non remodeling group(23.47±4.96)U(P<0.05).Pearson correlation analysis showed that IMR was significantly negatively correlated with LVEF(r=-0.296,P=0.038),and positively correlated with LVEDV and LVESV(r=0.492 and 0.371,P=0.018 and 0.047,respectively).ROC curve analysis showed that the value of IMR in predicting left ventricular remodeling 12 months after PCI in NSTEMI patients was(AUC)(95%CI)0.86(0.79~0.95).【Conclusion】IMR is a potential index to prediet the prognosis of NSTEMI patients.Clinicians can give effeetive treatment measures in time according to IMR,which is of great clinical significance to improve the prognosis of patients.
作者 蒙娟 耿珏 刘振国 MENG Juan;GENG Jue;LIU Zhen-guo(Department of Cardiology,Xixiang New Orientai Hospital 723500)
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2021年第8期1173-1175,1178,共4页 Journal of Clinical Research
基金 汉中市中心医院院级科研基金项目(YK2001)。
关键词 非ST段抬高型心肌梗死 心室功能 冠状动脉循环 Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infaretion Ventricular Function,Left Coronary Circulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献55

  • 1Weaver WD,Simes RJ,Betiu A. Comparison of primary coronary an-gioplasty and intravenous thromboytic therapy for acute myocardial infarc-tion:a quantitative review[J].JAMA:the Journal of the American Medical Association,1997,(23):2093-2098.
  • 2Camici PG,Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2007,(08):830-840.
  • 3van Hof AW,Liem AL,Surapranata H. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for a-cute myocardial infarction:myocardial blush grade[J].CIRCULATION,1998,(23):2302-2306.
  • 4Zhao B,Li J,Luo X. The role of von Willebr and factor and AD-AMTS13 in the no-reflow phenomenon:after primary percutaneous coro-nary intervention[J].Texas Heart Institute Journal,2011,(05):516-522.
  • 5Jaffe R,Charruon T,Puley G. Microvascular obstruction and the no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Circula-tion,2008,(24):3152-3156.
  • 6Winchester DE,Wen X,Brearley WD. Efficacy and safety of glyco-protein IIb/IIIa inhiitors during elective coronary revascularization:a me-ta-analysis of randomized trials performed in the era of stents and thien-opyridines[J].Journal of the America College of Cardiology,2011,(10):1190-1199.
  • 7Quintana M,Hjemdahl P,Sollevi A. Left ventricular function and cardiovascular events following adjuvant therapy with adenosine in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis.Results of the ATTenua-tion by Adenosine of Cardiac Complications (ATTACC) study[J].EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY,2003,(01):1-9.
  • 8Hamada S,Nishiue T,Nakam ura S. TIMI frame count immediately after primary coronary angioplasty as a predictor of function recovery in patients with T IMI3 reperfused acute myocardial infarction[J].Journal of the America College of Cardiology,2001,(03):666-671.
  • 9黄希(综述),何燕(审校).冠状动脉无复流现象的机制、诊断和防治进展[J].广西医科大学学报,2012,29(1):160-163. 被引量:4
  • 10赵慧强,陈晖,李东宝,张鹤萍,姚道阔,梁思文,丁晓松,王雷,李虹伟.心肌梗死后冠状动脉侧支循环发展进程[J].中国循环杂志,2012,27(4):266-269. 被引量:13

共引文献88

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部