期刊文献+

左西孟坦联合冻干重组人脑利钠肽对急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭患者心肌保护作用的临床研究 被引量:8

Protective effects of levosimendan combined with lyophilized recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide on myocardium in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察左西孟坦联合冻干重组人脑利钠肽(新活素)用于治疗急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭的疗效及对患者心肌的保护作用。方法选取长兴县人民医院2018年6月至2020年6月收治的急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭患者140例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,每组70例。对照组患者予以常规治疗,研究组患者增加左西孟坦联合新活素治疗。检测两组患者治疗前后血清肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、肌钙蛋白(cTnI)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)和超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)等心肌损伤相关指标,统计左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)及左心室射血分数(LVEF)等心脏超声指标变化情况,评价患者治疗后心力衰竭临床疗效水平,观察治疗期间药物不良反应发生情况。结果研究组患者治疗后CK-MB[(56.73±12.15)U/L]、cTnI[(0.41±0.19)μg/L]、LDH[(126.83±15.26)U/L]和hs-CRP[(1.59±0.27)mg/L]含量均显著低于对照组[(78.52±14.07)U/L、(0.68±0.21)μg/L、(187.25±23.04)U/L、(2.84±0.41)mg/L](t=5.569~12.418,均P<0.05);研究组患者LVEDD和LVESD均显著低于对照组,而LVEF显著高于对照组(t=4.435~6.426,均P<0.05);研究组患者治疗总有效率[88.57%(62/70)]显著高于对照组[72.86%(51/70)](χ^(2)=5.552,P<0.05);研究组治疗期间药物不良反应总发生率[11.43%(8/70)]与对照组[8.57%(6/70)]比较差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.317,P>0.05)。结论左西孟坦联合新活素可有效缓解急性心肌梗死合并心力衰竭患者心肌损伤程度,改善心肌功能,用药安全性较高,值得临床推广使用。 Objective To investigate the protective effects of levosimendan combined with lyophilized recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide(rhBNP)on myocardium in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure.Methods 140 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure who received treatment in Changxing People's Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were included in this study.They were randomly assigned to receive either routine treatment(control group,n=70)or routine treatment,levosimendan combined with rhBNP(study group,n=70).Serum levels of creatine kinase(CK)-MB,cardiac troponin I(cTnI),lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP),which were associated with myocardial injury,were measured in each group.In addition,the changes in cardiac ultrasound indexes left ventricular end diastolic diameter(LVEDD),left ventricular end systolic diameter(LVESD)and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)were observed.Clinical effects on heart failure were evaluated.Adverse drug reactions were monitored during the treatment.Results After treatment,CK-MB,cTnI,LDH and hs-CRP levels in the study group were(56.73±12.15)U/L,(0.41±0.19)μg/L,(126.83±15.26)U/L and(1.59±0.27)mg/L,respectively,which were significantly lower than those in the control group[(78.52±14.07)U/L,(0.68±0.21)μg/L,(187.25±23.04)U/L,(2.84±0.41)mg/L,t=5.569-12.418,all P<0.05].LVEDD and LVESD in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group,while LVEF in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group(t=4.435-6.426,all P<0.05).Total effective rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group[88.57%(62/70)vs.72.86%(51/70),χ^(2)=5.552,P<0.05].There was no significant difference in total incidence of adverse drug reactions between study and control groups[11.43%(8/70)vs.8.57%(6/70),χ^(2)=0.317,P>0.05].Conclusion Levosimendan combined with rhBNP can effectively alleviate myocardial injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure,improve myocardial function,is highly safe,and thereby deserves clinical application.
作者 陈跃欢 章秋芳 Chen Yuehuan;Zhang Qiufang(Department of Cardiology,Changxing People's Hospital,Huzhou 313100,Zhejiang Province,China)
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2021年第9期1303-1307,共5页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基金 浙江省医学会临床科研项目(2019ZYC-A27)。
关键词 心肌梗死 心力衰竭 心肌缺血 心肌再灌注损伤 肌酸激酶 肌钙蛋白 L-乳酸脱氢酶 C反应蛋白质 心室功能 Myocairdial infarction Heart failure Myocardial ischemia Myocardial reperfusion injury Creatine kinase Troponin L-lactate dehydrogenase C-reactive protein Ventricular function,left
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献129

  • 1虞华鹏,高成志,孙玲,马圣庭.重组人脑利钠肽治疗急性心肌梗死伴心衰患者124例临床效果[J].中国急救医学,2017,37(A01):198-199. 被引量:5
  • 2Kazuo Komamura,Miho Fukui,Toshihiro Iwasaku,Shinichi Hirotani,Tohru Masuyama.Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: Pathophysiology,diagnosis and treatment[J].World Journal of Cardiology,2014,6(7):602-609. 被引量:11
  • 3Frank A,Bonney M,Bonney S,et al.Myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury:from basic science to clinical bedside.Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2012,16:123-132.
  • 4Bainey KR,Armstrong PW.Clinical perspectives on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction.Am Heart J,2014,167:637-645.
  • 5Thind GS,Agrawal PR,Hirsh B,et al.Mechanisms of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and the cytoprotective role of minocycline:scope and limitations.Future Cardiol,2015,11:61-76.
  • 6Hausenloy DJ,Yellon DM.Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury:a neglected therapeutic target.J Clin Invest,2013,123:92-100.
  • 7Jennings RB.Historical perspective on the pathology of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.Circ Res,2013,113:428-438.
  • 8Skyschally A,Walter B,Heusch G.Coronary microembolization during early reperfusion:infarct extension,but protection by ischaemic postconditioning.Eur Heart J,2013,34:3314-3321.
  • 9Smith RA,Hartley RC,Murphy MP.Mitochondria-targeted small molecule therapeutics and probes.Antioxid Redox Signal,2011,15:3021-3038.
  • 10Frhlich GM,Meier P,White SK,et al.Myocardial reperfusion injury:looking beyond primary PCI.Eur Heart J,2013,34:1714-1722.

共引文献180

同被引文献105

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部