期刊文献+

两种缝合技术对形成剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕处憩室的差异分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the Difference of Two Suture Techniques on the Formation of Diverticulum at the Scar of Uterine Incision After Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析两种缝合技术对形成剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕处憩室的影响。方法在自愿的原则上,选择2019年1月-2020年5月该院收治的剖宫产患者56例作为研究对象,根据不同的缝合技术进行分组,对照组给予单层连续缝合技术,观察组给予双层连续缝合技术,记录两组患者的手术相关指标,实施为期1年的随访,观察患者子宫切口瘢痕处憩室的形成状况。结果观察组患者手术时间(29.02±2.63)min、术中出血量(191.01±31.09)mL、术后血性恶露持续时间(8.77±1.81)d、术后肛门排气时间(29.21±4.56)h、住院时间(7.58±1.79)d与对照组(28.49±2.67)min、(190.08±31.11)mL、(8.09±1.88)d、(29.27±4.68)h、(7.66±1.88)d相比,差异无统计学意义(t=0.748、0.112、1.379、0.049、0.163,P>0.05);观察组随访期间子宫切口瘢痕处憩室形成率、憩室残余子宫肌层厚度、憩室大小分别是7.14%(2/28)、(6.85±2.33)mm、(0.28±0.07)mL,较对照组数据28.57%(8/28)、(5.50±2.51)mm、(0.45±0.13)mL相比,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.383,t=2.086、6.093,P<0.05)。结论针对剖宫产患者,临床选择双层连续缝合技术有助于降低术后瘢痕处憩室的形成风险,加快伤口愈合。 Objective To analyze the influence of two suture techniques on the formation of diverticulum at the scar of uterine incision after cesarean section.Methods Based on the principle of voluntariness,56 cesarean section patients admitted to the hospital from January 2019 to May 2020 were selected as the research objects,grouped according to different suture techniques,and the control group was given a single-layer continuous suture technique;the observation group was given a double-layer continuous suture technique to record the operation-related indicators of the two groups of patients,and implement a one-year follow-up to observe the formation of the diverticulum at the scar of the uterine incision.Results Operation time(29.02±2.63)min,intraoperative blood loss(191.01±31.09)mL,postoperative bloody lochia duration(8.77±1.81)d,postoperative anal exhaust time(29.21±4.56)h,hospitalization time(7.58±1.79)d of observation group was compared with the control group(28.49±2.67)min,(190.08±31.11)mL,(8.09±1.88)d,(29.27±4.68)h,(7.66±1.88)d,the difference was not statistically significant(t=0.748,0.112,1.379,0.049,0.163,P>0.05);during the follow-up period of the observation group,the formation rate of diverticulum at the scar of uterine incision,the thickness of the residual myometrium of the diverticulum,and the size of the diverticulum were 7.14%(2/28),(6.85±2.33)mm,(0.28±0.07)mL,compared with the control group data of 28.57%(8/28),(5.50±2.51)mm,(0.45±0.13)mL,the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=4.383,t=2.086,6.093,P<0.05).Conclusion For patients with cesarean section,the clinical choice of double-layer continuous suture technique can help reduce the risk of diverticulum formation in scars and speed up wound healing.
作者 王燕 WANG Yan(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Mudan People's Hospital of Heze City,Heze,Shandong Province,274000 China)
出处 《世界复合医学》 2021年第7期84-86,共3页 World Journal of Complex Medicine
关键词 单层连续缝合技术 双层连续缝合技术 剖宫产 子宫切口瘢痕处憩室 Single-layer continuous suture technique Double-layer continuous suture technique Cesarean section Diverticulum at scar of uterine incision
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献101

  • 1成宁海,朱兰,郎景和,刘珠凤,孙大为,冷金花.101例腹壁子宫内膜异位症临床分析[J].生殖医学杂志,2007,16(2):82-85. 被引量:57
  • 2焦彤,陈静婴.超声对剖宫产子宫切口单层与双层缝合切口愈合情况的对比观察[J].中国超声医学杂志,1997,13(8):57-59. 被引量:42
  • 3Bij de Vaate A J, Brolmann HA, van der Voet LF, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan; 37(1):93-9.
  • 4Fischer RJ. Symptomatic cesarean scar diverticulum: a case report. J Reprod Med, 2006, Sep; 51(9) : 742 -4.
  • 5Souza JP, Gulmezoqlu A, Lumbiqanon P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short - term maternal outcomes: the 2004 -2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Per- inatal Health. BMC Med. 2010. 8(10) : 71 -81.
  • 6Talamonte VH, Lippi UG, Lopes RG, et al. Hysteroscopic findings in patients with post - menstrual spotting with prior cesarean section. Einstein(Sao Paulo), 2012, 10 (1) : 53 -6.
  • 7Glavind J, Madsen LD, Uldbjerg N, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of Cesare - an scar after single - and double - layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013; 42(2): 207- 12.
  • 8van der Voet LF, Vervoort A J, Veersema S, et al. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review [J]. BJOG, 2014, 121 (2) : 145-156.
  • 9Wang CJ, Huang HJ, Chao A, et al. Challenges in the transvaginal management of abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cesarean section scar defect [J]. Eur J Obstet Gyneeol Reprod Biol,2011,154(2) :218-222.
  • 10Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. Laparoscopie repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section [J]. Fertil Steril, 2008,89(4) :974-980.

共引文献95

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部