小切口阑尾炎切除术与传统手术治疗阑尾炎的临床疗效对比

Comparison of clinical efficacy between small incision appendectomy and traditional operation in the treatment of appendicitis

目的:对比分析小切口阑尾炎切除术与传统手术治疗阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法:2018年6月-2019年7月收治阑尾炎患者88例,随机分为两组,各44例。对照组采用传统手术治疗;观察组采用小切口阑尾炎切除术治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:观察组切口长度、住院时间、肛门排气时间及并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗总有效率略高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采用小切口阑尾炎切除术治疗阑尾炎,可减低并发症发生率,提升治疗效果,同时也可有效改善临床指标水平。

Objective:To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of small incision appendectomy and traditional surgery in the treatment of appendicitis.Methods:From June 2018 to July 2019,88 patients with appendicitis were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 44 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional operation.The observation group was treated with small incision appendectomy.We compared the treatment effect of the two groups.Results:In the observation group,the incision length,hospitalization time,anal exhaust time and complication rate were lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total effective rate of the observation group was slightly higher than that of the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Small incision appendectomy in the treatment of appendicitis can reduce the incidence of complications,improve the treatment effect,and effectively improve the level of clinical indicators.