柏拉图理念学说“分离”问题再考察

Reexamination of the Problem of Separation in Platon's Theory of Idea

对于柏拉图的理念,传统的主流观点将其理解为一种与具体事物相分离的东西,而陈康重新辨析柏拉图的文本和亚里士多德的相关批评,指出柏拉图的理念并未与事物分离。本文分别考察了这两种相互对立的观点各自的合理性,提出惟有从柏拉图哲学的辩证法精神出发,才能把争论双方的观点统一起来,即柏拉图的理念既是与事物分离的,又不是与事物分离的。

The traditional mainstream views understood Plato's ideas as separated from the specific things.However,through analysis of Plato's own texts and Aristotle's Plato-criticism Kang Chen(Chung-Hwan Chen)pointed out that Plato's ideas are not separated.This paper reexamines each of these two opposing views of their respective justifiability and makes a conclusion that only based on Plato's dialectic standpoint we can unify the two opposing views,namely Plato's ideas are as separated as not separated from the specific things.