期刊文献+

拜登政府《临时国家安全战略指南》解读--基于话语分析的视角 被引量:11

Interpreting Interim National Security Strategic Guidance:A Discourse Analysis Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]拜登政府提前发布《临时国家安全战略指南》,传达关于美国政府对当前国际安全环境的判断。从话语分析角度解读该战略文件,有助于补充发掘拜登政府国家安全战略的新特点、新规律、新动向,补充现有研究。[方法/过程]基于话语分析视角,以《临时国家安全战略指南》及拜登内阁成员公开讲话作为真实语料,综合使用批评隐喻分析、社会行为者网络以及语料库辅助话语研究相结合的方法。[结果/结论]话语分析是情报分析的重要工具,解读拜登政府《临时国家安全战略指南》发现,拜登政府将强势争取世界领导地位,积极修复盟友关系,采取一切手段对抗、消减“中国对美威胁”,同时有效推动美国国内安全问题的解决。 [Purpose/Significance]The interim guidance issued by the Biden administration ahead of schedule conveys President Biden's vision for how America will engage with the world.An interpretation of this strategic document from the perspective of discourse analysis can help reveal the new features and novel tendencies of the US government on the current international security environment,which serves as a complement to existing studies.[Method/Process]Based on the corpus of Interim National Security Strategic Guidance and speeches by the members of the Biden administration,this study combines the discourse analysis methods of critical metaphor analysis,social actor network,and corpus-assisted discourse studies.[Result/Conclusion]Discourse analysis is an important tool of intelligence analysis.It is found that the Biden administration will vigorously strive for world leadership,actively renew its alliances,take all means to counter and reduce"China threats",and effectively promote the solution of its domestic security problems.
作者 刘博怡 Liu Boyi(International Studies College,National University of Defense Technology,Nanjing 210039)
出处 《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第9期12-18,共7页 Journal of Intelligence
关键词 拜登政府 临时国家安全战略指南 话语分析 语料库 Biden administration Interim National Security Strategic Guidance discourse analysis corpus
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献66

  • 1汤光鸿.论国家形象[J].国际问题研究,2004(4):18-23. 被引量:70
  • 2Baker, P. 2004. Querying keywords [J]. Journal of English Linguistics 32: 346-359.
  • 3Baker, P. &A. McEnery. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper text [J]. Language and Politics 4.. 197-226.
  • 4Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos, M. Khosravinik, M. Krzyzanowski, A. McEnery&R. Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press [J]. Discourse and Society 19: 273-306.
  • 5Berber-Sardinha, A. 2000. Comparing corpora with WordSmith Tools: How large must the reference corpus be? [A]. In The Proceedings of the Work-shop on Comparing Corpora [C]. Morristown, NJ. : Association for Computational Linguistics. 7-13.
  • 6Crouteau, D. & W. Hoynes. 2001. The Business of Media [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Pine Forge Press.
  • 7Fairclough, N. 2000. New Labour, New Language? [M]. London: Routledge.
  • 8Firth, J. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955 [A]. In F. Palmer (ed.). Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952-59 [C]. London and Harlow: Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd. 168-205.
  • 9Flowerdew, J. 1997. The discourse of colonial with-drawal: A case study in the creation of mythic discourse[J]. Discourse and Society 8: 453-477.
  • 10Hardt-Mautner, G. 1995. ' Only connect' : Critical discourse analysis and corpus Linguistics (UCREL Technical Paper 6) [Z]. Lancaster: University of Lancaster.

共引文献242

同被引文献97

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部