期刊文献+

PCI后患者复发性心绞痛与心肌微循环的相关性分析 被引量:6

Correlation between recurrent angina pectoris and myocardial microcirculation in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后心绞痛复发与心肌微循环的相关性。方法回顾性纳入2016年4月至2019年4月于秦皇岛市第一医院心内科行PCI的182例急性心肌梗死患者作研究对象,根据随访1年中有无心绞痛复发分为复发组(48例)与对照组(134例)。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析不同微循环阻力指数(IMR)、冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)患者1年内心绞痛复发率,Logistic回归分析心绞痛复发相关因素。结果复发组低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和IMR高于对照组,Killip分级≤Ⅱ级例数和CFR低于对照组(P均<0.05);IMR<25 U的患者心绞痛复发风险显著低于IMR≥25U者,CFR>2.9的患者心绞痛复发风险显著低于CFR≤2.9者(P均<0.001);LDL-C(OR=1.930,95%CI:1.229~3.032,P=0.004)和IMR(OR=1.283,95%CI:1.175~1.402,P<0.001)为心绞痛复发的危险因素,入院时Killip分级≤Ⅱ级(OR=0.248,95%CI:0.085~0.722,P<0.001)和CFR(OR=0.228,95%CI:0.082~0.634,P=0.005)为心绞痛复发的保护因素。结论急性心肌梗死患者PCI后心肌微循环情况与心绞痛复发相关,监测术后IMR和CFR或有助于预测患者预后。 Objective To discuss the correlation between recurrent angina pectoris(AP)and myocardial microcirculation in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods AMI patients(n=182)undergone PCI were retrospectively chosen from Department of Cardiology in the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City from Apr.2016 to Apr.2019.After followed up for 1 y,all patients were divided into recurrent group(n=48)and control group(n=134).The index of microcirculatory resistance(IMR),coronary flow reserve(CFR)and recurrent rate of AP within 1 y were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier method,and related factors of AP recurrence were analyzed by using Logistic regression analysis.Results The levels of LDL-C and IMR were higher,and cases of Killip grade≤Ⅱand CFR were lower in recurrent group than those in control group(all P<0.05).The risk of AP recurrent was significantly lower in patients with IMR<25U than that in patients with IMR≥25U,and was significantly lower in patients with CFR>2.9 than that in patients with CFR≤2.9(all P<0.001).LDL-C(OR=1.930,95%CI:1.229~3.032,P=0.004)and IMR(OR=1.283,95%CI:1.175~1.402,P<0.001)were risk factors of AP recurrence.Killip grade≤Ⅱ(OR=0.248,95%CI:0.085~0.722,P<0.001)and CFR(OR=0.228,95%CI:0.082~0.634,P=0.005)at hospitalization time were protective factors of AP recurrence.Conclusion The myocardial microcirculation after PCI is correlated to AP recurrence in AMI patients,and monitoring of IMR and CFR is perhaps beneficial to predict patients'prognosis.
作者 韩孝宇 代玉涵 朱爱红 姜晓冬 安建立 张扬 王文广 杨红梅 撖越 Han Xiaoyu;Dai Yuhan;Zhu Aihong;Jiang Xiaodong;An Jianli;Zhang Yang;Wang Wenguang;Yang Hongmei;Han Yue(Department of Cardiology,First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City,Qinhuangdao 066000,China;不详)
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2021年第9期1086-1089,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
基金 河北省秦皇岛市科技计划自筹支撑项目(201902A168)。
关键词 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 急性心肌梗死 心肌微循环 微循环阻力指数 Percutaneous coronary intervention Acute myocardial infarction Myocardial microcirculation Index of microcirculatory resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献70

  • 1杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,徐立,葛永贵,王红石,李惟铭,倪祝华,夏昆,连勇,薛永利,马利祥.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(6):517-522. 被引量:74
  • 2Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 3Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 4Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 5Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 6Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 7Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 8Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 9Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 10Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.

共引文献2283

同被引文献96

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部