期刊文献+

新时代中美关系的发展趋势 被引量:7

The Development Trend of Sino-U.S.Relations in the New Era
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着中美两国都认定自己进入"新时代",两国开始重新审视对方以及双边关系,从而导致中美关系也"进入新时代"。中美关系在新时代既不同于以合作为主旋律的"昨天",更不同于冷战对抗状态的"前天"。新时代中美关系的主旋律是战略竞争,双方互为战略竞争对手。这种战略竞争对手不同于冷战对抗的敌人。中美战略竞争应当是可控的、良性的、建设性的竞争;竞争并不排斥合作。在中美关系的新时代,双方在地缘政治、意识形态、经济和人文、全球治理这四个领域的竞争将趋于强化,而合作趋于弱化,从而导致中美战略竞争总体上将十分激烈并呈持久战态势。中美战略竞争不会滑向新冷战,其原因除了中国的主观能动作用外,更重要的是世界大势的制约。世界多极化、经济全球化、和平与发展时代主题、全球政治觉醒等世界大势对新时代中美关系发挥着不可忽视的塑造作用。 As both China and the United States believe that they have entered a new era,the two countries began to re-examine each other and their bilateral relations,which led to Sino-U.S.relations entering a new period.In the new era,Sino-U.S.relations are different not only from the cooperativebased one which could be called"yesterday,"but also from the"day before yesterday"of the Cold War confrontation.The main theme of the SinoUS relations in the new era is strategic competition,and the two sides are strategic rivals of each other.This strategic rivalry is different than the confrontation during the Cold War.The strategic competition between China and the United States should be controllable,benign and constructive and does not exclude cooperation.In the new era,the competition between the two sides will tend to intensify in four areas,including geopolitics,ideology,economics and humanities,and global governance,resulting in a fierce and lasting strategic overall competition between China and the United States.The reason why the strategic competition between China and the United States will not slip into a new Cold War is not only China’s subjective actions,but also the constraints of general world trends.World trends such as multi-polarization,economic globalization,an era of peace and development,and global political awakening all play an important role in shaping Sino-U.S.relations in the new era.
作者 刘建飞 Liu Jianfei
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期9-23,5,共16页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
基金 2020年度中共中央党校(国家行政学院)校级科研项目“人类命运共同体思想研究”阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献74

  • 1孙哲,李巍.美国贸易代表办公室与美国国际贸易政策[J].美国研究,2007,21(1):85-106. 被引量:19
  • 2林玲,李江冰.《布什政府的贸易促进权之争》,载《美国新经济周期与中美经贸关系——全国美国经济学会第七届年会论文集》(2003年),第156-164页.
  • 3《美国宪法及其修正案》(朱曾汶译),北京·商务印书馆,2015年版,第4-9页.
  • 4Curtis A. Bradley, "Federalism and the Treaty Power, "Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ( American Society of In- ternational Law), Vol. 98 ( March 31 - April 3, 2004) , pp. 341 -343.
  • 5Douglas A. Irwin, "From Smoot-Hawley to Reciprocal Trade Agreements : Changing the Course of U. S. Trade Poli- cy in the 1930 " in Michael D. Bordo, Claudia Goldin & Eugene N. White, The Defining Moment: The Great De- pression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century( Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1998 ), pp. 327 - 329.
  • 6Paola Conconi, Giovanni Facchini & Maurizio Zanardi, "Fast Track Authority and International Trade Negotia- tions," May 2011, available at: http ://www. ecares, org/ecare/personal/conconi $/web/FTA. pdf, p. 4.
  • 7David A. Lake, "International Economic Structures and American Foreign Economic Policy, 1887 -1934," World Politics, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Jul. , 1983), p.538.
  • 8David E. Birenbaum, "The Omnibus Trade Act of 1988 : Trade Law Dialectics," University of Pennsylvania Journal oflnternational Law,Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 655-656.
  • 9Kenneth W. Dam, "Significance of the ReciprocalTrade Agreements Act, "Trade Policy Analyses ( Cordell Hull In- stitute), Vol. 6, No. 4 (June. 2004) p. 4.
  • 10Karen E. Schnietz, "The Reaction of Private Interests to the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act, "International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 1 ( Winter, 2003 ), p. 214.

同被引文献144

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部