期刊文献+

德国介入南海问题的主要特点与战略考量 被引量:4

The Main Characteristics and Strategic Considerations of Germany's Intervention in the South China Sea Issue
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着近年来南海局势的发展,特别是围绕南海问题中美博弈的加深,美国的盟友和伙伴相继介入南海问题进程。在南海问题上,德国总体保持战略审慎与克制,包括坚持多边主义,重视国际司法手段,秉持中立立场,且与英法两国的南海政策存在差异,是潜在的影响力量。然而,近年来德国对南海问题的介入程度呈逐渐加深态势。德国介入南海问题主要出于应对来自美国的联盟压力和法国的伙伴压力,以及维护海上战略通道安全的考虑。而中德密切的经贸关系、德国国内的政治生态以及德国海洋战略等因素则限制德国进一步介入南海问题。展望未来,默克尔之后的德国外交政策将迎来调整空间,不过默克尔时期“基于经济的非对抗主义”政策大概率继续主导中德关系,德国对南海问题的介入也难以超越现有的框架。 With the situation developed in the South China Sea in recent years,especially the deepening of the game between China and the United States around the South China Sea issue,the Allies and partners of the United States successively intervened in the process of intervening in the South China Sea issue.Germany is a potential influence on the South China Sea issue.Germany has generally maintained strategic prudence and restraint on the South China Sea issue,including adherence to multilateralism,emphasis on international judicial means,upholding a neutral position,and being different from the South China Sea policy of Britain and France.But in recent years Germany's intervention in the South China Sea issue has shown a trend of gradually deepening.Germany's intervention in the South China Sea issue mainly stems from the consideration of responding to alliance pressure from the United States and partner pressure from France,as well as maintaining the security of strategic maritime channels.However,the close economic and trade relations between China and Germany,Germany's domestic political factors and Germany's maritime strategy limit Germany's further intervention in the South China Sea issue.Looking into the future,Germany's foreign policy after Merkel will have room for adjustment,but the“economy-based non-confrontation”during Merkel's period will likely continue to dominate China-German relations,and Germany's intervention in the South China Sea issue will hardly go beyond the existing framework.
作者 李忠林 LI Zhonglin(School of Political Science and Public Administration,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,China)
出处 《东南亚研究》 CSSCI 2021年第4期88-105,153,共19页 Southeast Asian Studies
基金 国家社科重大项目“印太战略下‘东盟中心地位’重构与中国—东盟共建‘海上丝绸之路’研究”(20&ZD145) 华东政法大学科学研究项目“印太战略、海洋联盟与美国印太海洋联盟体系研究”(19HZK020)。
关键词 德国 南海问题 中德关系 美国 多边主义 Germany the South China Sea Issue China-German Relations the United States Multilateralism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1Sebastian Harnisch/Hanns W. Maull, Germany as a Civilian Power? The foreign policy of the Berlin Republic, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001.
  • 2Matthias Geis, ,,Die Armee, die nicht verweigern darf", DieZeit, Nr. 31, 27.07.2006, http:// www. zeit. de/2006/31/Afrika_Historie.
  • 3Carlo Masala, ,,Moglichkeiten einer Neuorientierung deutscher Augen- und Sicherheitspolitik", Aus PolitikundZeitgeschichte, 43/2008, S. 22 -27, bierS. 27.
  • 4Stefan FrOhlich, ,, Deutsche Augen- und Sicherheitspolitik im Rahmen der EU", Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 43/2008, S. 15 - 21, hier S. 21.
  • 5Eberhard Sandschneider, ,,Deutsche Aul3enpolitik: eine Gestaltungsmacht in der Kontinuitfitsfalle", Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 10/2012, S. 3 - 9.
  • 6Deutscher Bundestag, Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung. Globalisierunggestalten -- Part- nerschaften ausbauen Verantwortung teilen, Drucksache 17/8600, 8.2. 2012.
  • 7Michael E. Smith, "Sending the Bundeswehr to the Balkans: The Domestic Politics of Reflexive Multilateralism' German Politics and Society, Vol. 14, Winter 1996, pp. 49 - 67, here p. 65.
  • 8Peter Katzenstein, "The Smaller European States, Germany, and Europe", in Peter Katzenstein (ed.), Tamed Power: Germany in Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997, pp. 251- 304, here p. 289.
  • 9Christoph NeBh6ver, Die Chinapolitik Deutschlands und Frankreichs zwischen AuBenwirt- scha fts f 6rderung und Menschenrechtsorientierung ( 1989 his 1997) : Au f der Suche nach Balance, Ham- burg: Institut for Asienkunde, 1999, S. 17 - 19.
  • 10Christoph NeBh6ver, Die Chinapolitik Deutschlands und Frankreichs zwischen AuBenwirt- scha fts f 6rderung und Menschenrechtsorientierung ( 1989 his 1997) : Au f der Suche nach Balance, Ham- burg: Institut for Asienkunde, 1999, S. 20.

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部