期刊文献+

中国英语学习者论元结构过度泛化中的固着和前摄作用 被引量:1

Entrenching and preempting mechanisms in Chinese EFL learners’ argument structure overgeneralizations
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究通过对致使移动构式过度泛化句的可接受性判断任务,调查了固着频率、前摄频率和语言水平对中国英语学习者论元结构过度泛化的的影响。结果显示:过度泛化中不存在独立的固着效应;而前摄效应相对明显,但作用方向与前摄假说相左,且受到固着频率的强化;各水平学习者对过度泛化句的接受度普遍较高,且以高水平学习者为最。因为固着假说存在理论缺陷;二语学习者缺乏前摄抑制机制的基础条件,只关注于前摄结构和对应过度泛化之间的语义关联性而忽略了区别性;且语义关联意识会随着语言水平的发展而逐步深化。 Using an acceptability judgment task of overgeneralized instances of the caused-motion construction, the present study investigates the influences of entrenching frequency, preempting frequency and L2 proficiency on Chinese EFL learners’ argument structure overgeneralizations. The results indicate that 1) there is no independent entrenching effect in overgeneralizations, 2) the preempting effect is relatively strong, but it conflicts with the Preemption Hypothesis in terms of the effect direction and is intensified by entrenching frequency, 3) the acceptability is judged relatively high in general, especially by the advanced learners. Such results are attributed to that 1) there exists a theoretical defect in the Entrenchment Hypothesis, 2) L2 learners lack of both basic prerequisites for the preempting mechanism and they only focus on the semantic associations but not on the distinctions between the preempting-overgeneralized structure pairs, 3) while the awareness of the semantic associations is raised as their language proficiency increases.
作者 韩百敬 曾涛 HAN Baijing;ZENG Tao
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期72-82,共11页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 教育部人文社科项目“抽象结构对汉英句式启动效应的眼动研究”(18YJA740004) 湖南省社科项目“抽象算式对汉语句式的结构启动效应”(16YBA083) 重庆市教委人文社科项目“动词-结构双向互动视角下句法表征与发展研究”(19SKGH178) 重庆市社会科学规划项目“民族地区城市语言景观中的语言使用状况研究”(2018PY31)的资助。
关键词 论元结构 过度泛化 固着 前摄 argument structure overgeneralizations entrenchment preemption
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献56

  • 1张伯江.现代汉语的双及物结构式[J].中国语文,1999(3):175-184. 被引量:431
  • 2吴旭东,陈晓庆.中国英语学生课堂环境下词汇能力的发展[J].现代外语,2000,23(4):349-360. 被引量:292
  • 3刘丹青.汉语给予类双及物结构的类型学考察[J].中国语文,2001(5):387-398. 被引量:180
  • 4崔艳嫣,王同顺.基于CLEC的中国学习者英语派生词缀习得分析[J].国外外语教学,2005(2):5-11. 被引量:24
  • 5Ambridge, B., J. Pine, C. Rowland&C. Young. 2008. The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgments of argu-ment structure overgeneralization errors [J].Cognition 106: 87-129.
  • 6Baker, C. 1979. Syntactic theory and the projection problem [J].Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533-581.
  • 7Bowerman, M. 1988. The "no negative evidence" problem: How do children avoid con-structing an overly general grammar? [A]. In J. Hawkins (ed.). Explaining Language Universals [C].Oxford: Blackwell. 73-101.
  • 8Bowerman, M. 1996. Argument structure and learnability, Is a solution in sight? [J]. Berkeley Linguistic Society 22: 454-468.
  • 9Bowerman, M. & W. Croft. 2008. The acquisition of the English causative alternation [A]. In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (eds.Y. Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Language Acquisition [C]. Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erl-baum. 279-308.
  • 10Brooks. P. , M. Tomasello, K. Dodson&L. Lewis. 1999. Children's overgeneralization of fixed transitivity verbs: The entrenchment hypothesis [J]. Child Development 70: 1325-1337.

共引文献34

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部