期刊文献+

不同剂量羟考酮PCEA与PCIA用于前列腺术后镇痛效果比较 被引量:3

Analgesic effects of different doses of oxycodone for PCEA and PCIA after prostatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同剂量羟考酮通过患者硬膜外自控镇痛(PCEA)与患者静脉自控镇痛(PCIA)用于前列腺术后的镇痛效果。方法选取在2018年1月~2020年1月期间于我院行前列腺术的210例患者,采用随机数字表法将患者分成A1、A2、A3、B1、B2、B36组,每组各35例。其中A1、A2、A3组术后镇痛采用PCIA方案,分别使用0.6mg/kg、0.8mg/kg、1.0mg/kg的羟考酮+托烷司琼10mg+0.9%氯化钠溶液至100mL;B1、B2、B3术后镇痛采取PCEA方案,分别使用0.6mg/kg、0.8mg/kg、1.0mg/kg的羟考酮+托烷司琼10mg+0.9%氯化钠溶液至100mL。比较手术前(T0)、术后6h(T1)、术后12h(T2)、术后24h(T3)及术后48h(T4)6组患者的生命体征、视觉疼痛模拟评分(VAS)及不良反应的发生情况。结果各组患者在不同时间点的MAP、HR及SPO 2的水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B1、B2、B3组患者分别在T1、T2、T3、T4时间的VAS评分显著低于A1、A2、A3组(均P<0.05),A2、A3组患者分别在T1、T2、T3、T4时间的VAS评分显著低于A1组(均P<0.05),B2、B3组患者分别在T1、T2、T3、T4时间的VAS评分显著低于B1组(均P<0.05)。B1、B2、B3不良反应的发生率分别显著低于A1、A2、A3组(均P<0.05)。B1、B2不良反应的发生率显著低于A2、A3组(P<0.05),且A3组不良反应的发生率显著高于A1、A2,B3组的不良反应的发生率显著高于B1、B2组(均P<0.05)。结论对前列腺手术患者术后,不同剂量羟考酮PCEA的镇痛效果及不良反应发生率均显著优于不同剂量羟考酮的PCIA,且当羟考酮的剂量为0.8mg/kg时,效果最佳。 Objective To explore the analgesic effect of different doses of oxycodone intravenous patient-controlled analgesia(PCIA)and epidural patient-controlled analgesia(PCEA)for patients after prostate surgery and provide an optimal choice for clinical treatment.Methods 210 patients who underwent prostatectomy in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were randomly divided into 6 groups A1,A2,A3,B1,B2 and B3,with 35 cases in each group.PCIA scheme was used for postoperative analgesia in groups A1,A2 and A3.Oxycodone+tropisetron 10mg+0.9%sodium chloride solution of 0.6mg/kg,0.8mg/kg and 1.0mg/kg were used to 100mL respectively.PCEA scheme was used for postoperative analgesia in groups B1,B2 and B3.Oxycodone+tropisetron 10mg+0.9%sodium chloride solution of 0.6mg/kg,0.8mg/kg and 1.0mg/kg were used to 100ml respectively.The vital signs,visual pain analogue scale(VAS)and adverse reactions of 6 groups were compared before operation(T0),6h(T1),12h(T2),24h(T3)and 48h(T4).Results There was no significant difference in the levels of map,HR and SPO(2)at different time points in each group(P>0.05).The VAS scores of group B1,B2 and B3 at T1,T2,T3 and T4 were significantly lower than those of group A1,A2 and A3(all P<0.05),the VAS scores of group A2 and A3 at T1,T2,T3 and T4 were significantly lower than those of group A1(all P<0.05),and the VAS scores of group B2 and B3 at T1,T2,T3 and T4 were significantly lower than those of group B1(all P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in B1,B2 and B3 groups were significantly lower than those in A1,A2 and A3 groups(all P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in B1 and B2 was significantly lower than that in A2 and A3 groups(P<0.05),and the incidence of adverse reactions in A3 group was significantly higher than that in A1 and A2.The incidence of adverse reactions in B3 group was significantly higher than that in B1 and B2 groups(all P<0.05).Conclusion For prostate surgery patients,the analgesic effect and incidence of adverse reactions of different doses of oxycodone PCEA are significantly better than different doses of oxycodone PCIA,and when the dose of oxycodone is 0.8 mg/kg,Best effect.
作者 胡俊 黄菲 刘丹 阚智勇 杨文庆 徐小琴 HU Jun;HUANG Fei;LIU Dan;KAN Zhiyong;YANG Wenqing;XU Xiaoqin(Department of Anesthesiology,Meishan Hospital,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Meishan 620020,Sichuan,China)
出处 《西部医学》 2021年第9期1369-1373,共5页 Medical Journal of West China
基金 眉山市科技计划项目(2019KJ2032)。
关键词 羟考酮 静脉自控镇痛 硬膜外自控镇痛 前列腺 术后镇痛 Oxycodone Intravenously controlled analgesia Epidural controlled analgesia Prostate surgery Postoperative analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献137

  • 1杨成宇,程书栋,闫惠忠,高利军,王慕华.三种术式切除前列腺增生组织的重量及比例分析[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2012,5(3):53-55. 被引量:5
  • 2王荣,范明,章小平.经尿道前列腺中叶剜除术治疗高危前列腺中叶增生[J].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2013,6(1):35-38. 被引量:14
  • 3徐建国.疼痛药物治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:264-275.
  • 4赵继军.疼痛临床管理[J].医学研究杂志,2007,36(9):61-61. 被引量:13
  • 5王伟鹏,李立环,译.临床麻醉学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:977.
  • 6曾因明,邓小明,主译.米勒麻醉学[M].第6版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006:410-411.
  • 7Apolone G, Bertetto O, Caraceni A, et al. Pain in cancer.An outcome research project to evaluate the epidemiology, the quality and the effects of pain treatment in cancer patients[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2006, 2(4):7.
  • 8Dev R, Del Fabbro E, Bruera E. Patient-controlled analgesia in patients with advanced cancer. Should patients be in control[J]? J Pain Symptom Manage, 2011, 42(2):296-300.
  • 9Zech DF, Grond SU, Lynch J, et al. Transdermal fentanyl and initial dose-finding with patient-controlled analgesia in cancer pain. A pilot study with 20 terminally ill cancer patients[J]. Pain, 1992, 50(3): 293-301.
  • 10Zech DF, Lehmann KA. Transdermal fentanyl in combination with initial intravenous dose titration by patient-controlled analgesia[J]. Anticancer Drugs, 1995, 6 (Suppl 3):44-49.

共引文献605

同被引文献41

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部