期刊文献+

左室射血分数<40%主动脉瓣关闭不全患者术后心功能恢复影响因素分析 被引量:2

Analysis of influencing factors of postoperative cardiac function recovery in patients with aortic insufficiency with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)合并左室射血分数(LVEF)<40%的患者瓣膜手术后心功能恢复的影响因素。方法选取自2010年1月至2018年12月北部战区总医院收治的左室收缩功能减低(LVEF<0.40,Simpson法)的AI并行单纯主动脉瓣置换(AVR)的99例患者为研究对象。根据瓣膜术后6个月时左室收缩功能是否恢复(LVEF≥0.50,Simpson法)将患者分为恢复组(n=52,LVEF≥0.50,Simpson法)与未恢复组(n=47,LVEF<0.50 Simpson法)。记录并比较两组患者术前的基本临床资料及超声数据。应用χ^(2)检验分析左室收缩末期容积(LVESV)、三尖瓣口舒张早期前向血流峰速/三尖瓣瓣环侧壁舒张早期峰速(Et/Et′)与心功能减低的AVR术后LVEF不能恢复的关系。结果单因素分析发现,两组患者的舒张压、左房前后径(LAD)、左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、LVESV、Et/Et′比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析发现,Et/Et′较高(P>0.001)和/或LVESV较大(P>0.016)是AVR术后LVEF不易恢复的危险因素。术前三尖瓣Et/Et′≥7.5和/或LVESV≥155.0 ml且LVEF<0.40的AI患者术后心功能更不易恢复。结论术前左室收缩末期内径较大和/或右室舒张功能出现减低是LVEF<0.40的AI患者术后心功能不易恢复的危险因素。 Objective To investigate the influencing factors of cardiac function recovery in patients with aortic insufficiency(AI)with left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)<40%after valve surgery.Methods A total of 99 patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function(LVEF<0.40,Simpson method)treated with AI and simple aortic valve replacement(AVR)were selected from January 2010 to December 2018 in General Hospital of Northern Theater Command.Patients were divided into recovery group(n=52,LVEF≥0.50,Simpson)and non-recovery group(n=47,LVEF<0.50,Simpson)according to whether left ventricular systolic function was restored at 6 months after valvular surgery.Preoperative basic clinical data and ultrasound data were recorded and compared between the two groups.Theχ2 test was used to analyze the relationship between the left ventricular end-systolic volume(LVESV),early diastolic anterior flow peak velocity of tricuspid valve orifice/early diastolic peak velocity of lateral wall of tricuspid valve ring(Et/Et′)and non-recovery of LVEF after AVR with reduced cardiac function.Results Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in diastolic blood pressure,left anterior posterior diameter(LAD),left ventricular end diastolic volume(LVEDV),LVESV and Et/Et′between 2 groups(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that high Et/Et′(P>0.001)and/or high LVESV(P>0.016)were risk factors for LVEF recovery after AVR.AI patients with tricuspid Et/Et′≥7.5 and/or LVESV≥155.0 ml and LVEF<0.40 were less likely to recover cardiac function after surgery.Conclusion Large left ventricular end systolic diameter and/or decreased right ventricular diastolic function before operation are the risk factors for cardiac function recovery in patients with aortic insufficiency with LVEF<0.40.
作者 岳凤捷 金岩 祝岩 尹宗涛 韩劲松 朱岩 辛芳冉 王辉山 YUE Feng-jie;JING Yan;ZHU Yan;YING Zong-tao;HAN Jin-song;ZHU Yan;XIN Fang-ran;WANG Hui-shan(China Medical University,Shenyang 110000,China;Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,General Hospital of Northern Theater Command,Shenyang 110016,China)
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2021年第8期857-860,865,共5页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81771833) 2019年度辽宁省重点研发计划项目。
关键词 右室舒张功能 左室收缩末期容积 左室射血分数 主动脉瓣关闭不全 瓣膜置换术 Right ventricular diastolic function Left ventricular end-systolic volume Left ventricular ejection fraction Aortic insufficiency Valve replacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1Enriquez-Sarano M,Akins CW,Vahanian A.Mitral regurgitation.Lancet,2009,373(9672):1382-1394.
  • 2Baskett RJ,Exner DV,Hirsch GM,et al.Mitral insufficiency and morbidity and mortality in left ventricular dysfunction.Can J Cardiol,2007,23(10):797-800.
  • 3Borghetti V,Campana M,Scotti C,et al.Biological versus prosthetic ring in mitral-valve repair:enhancement of mitral annulus dynamics and left ventricular function with pericardial annuloplasty at long tenn.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2000,17(4):431-439.
  • 4Ben Zekry S,Lang RM,Sugeng L,et al.Mitral annulus dynamics early after valve repair:preliminary observations of the effect of resectional versus non-resectional approaches.J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2011,24(11):1233-1242.
  • 5Suri RM,Aviernos JF,Dearani JA,et al.Management of less-than-severe mitral regurgitation:should guidelines recommend earlier surgical intervention? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2011,40(2):496-502.
  • 6Khoo NS,Smallhorn JF.Mechanism of valvular regurgitation.Curr Opin Pediatr,2011,23(5):512-517.
  • 7Poglajen G,Harlander M,Gersak B.Ex vivo study of altered mitral apparatus geometry in functional mitral regurgitation.Heart SurgForum,2010,13(3):E172-E176.
  • 8Komeda M,Kitamura H,Fukaya S,et al.Surgical treatment for functional mitral regurgitation.Circ J,2009,73(Suppl A):A23-A28.
  • 9Wan CK,Suri RM,Li Z,et al.Management of moderate functional mitral regurgitation at the time of aortic valve replacement:is conco-mitant mitral valve repair necessary ? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2009,137(3):635-640.
  • 10Mallidi HR,Pelletier MP,Lamb J,et al.Late outcomes in patients with uncorrected mild to moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2004,127(3):636-644.

共引文献6

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部