摘要
基于最高人民法院判定海事调查责任认定书影响当事人权利义务的前提,对海事调查行为的性质进行了系统梳理。海事调查并非是一种行政行为,它是多种行为组成的行为链,且行为与行为之间既具有独立性,也具有起承转合的顺序关系。各行为根据产生的不同法律效果,体现出不同的行为性质。对海事调查行为的司法审查,应限于影响当事人权利义务关系的责任判定行为。对于不影响当事人权利义务关系的其他内容,不应纳入司法审查范围。
According to the ruling of the Supreme People’s Court,the confirmation of maritime investigation responsibility affects the rights and obligations of the parties,based on this,the paper systematically sorts out the nature of maritime investigation.Maritime investigation is not an administrative act,it is a chain of various behaviors which are independent and sequential with each other.Depending on the different legal effects,the nature of behavior is also different.The judicial review of maritime investigation should be limited to the liability judgement which affects the rights and obligations of the parties.The judicial review should not include the contents which have no effect on the rights and obligations of the parties.
作者
于登君
YU Deng-jun(Dalian Maritime Safety Administration of the People’s Republic of China,Dalian 116300,China)
出处
《中国海商法研究》
CSSCI
2021年第3期97-104,共8页
Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词
水上交通事故
海事调查
可诉性
安全调查
waterborne traffic accident
maritime investigation
lawsuit possibility
safety investigation