期刊文献+

基于标准化分级的转运方案对急诊患者院内转运时间及不良事件的影响 被引量:2

Impact of a Standardized Grading Based Transport Protocol on in-hospital Transport Times and Adverse Events in Emergency Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究基于标准化分级的转运方案对急诊患者院内转运时间及不良事件的影响。方法选择2019年11月至2020年4月我院院内转运的患者100例,使用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和研究组。对照组采用常规转移方案,研究组采用基于标准化分级的转运方案。对比两组的院内转运时间、不良事件情况。结果研究组院内转运至CT/MRI检查、专科病房、介入室、手术室的时间均短于对照组(P<0.05),研究组的不良事件总发生率(8.00%)低于对照组的(28.00%)(P<0.05)。结论基于标准化分级的转运方案能够缩短急诊患者院内转运时间,降低转运途中不良事件的发生。 Objective To study the effect of a standardized grading based transport protocol on the in-hospital transport time and adverse events in emergency patients.Methods One hundred patients who underwent in-hospital transfer in our hospital from November 2019 to April 2020 were selected and divided into control and study groups using the random number table method.A conventional transfer protocol was used in the control group,and a transport protocol based on standardized grading was used in the study group.Time to in-hospital transfer,adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results The time of in-hospital transfer to CT/MRI examination,specialist ward,interventional or operating room in the study group was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05),and the overall incidence of adverse events in the study group (8.00%) was lower than that in the control group (28.00%) (P<0.05).Conclusion A transport scheme based on standardized grading is able to shorten the in-hospital transit time of emergency patients and reduce the occurrence of adverse events on the transit route.
作者 黄丽霞 陈丹丹 HUANG Li-xia;CHEN Dan-dan(Department of Emergency,the Third People's Hospital of Huizhou,Huizhou,Guangdong 516001)
出处 《智慧健康》 2021年第14期102-104,共3页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 标准化分级 急诊 转运 不良事件 Standardized grading Emergency Transport Adverse events
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献118

  • 1肖建,杜春玲.慢性阻塞性肺疾病病因及发病机制研究进展[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(11):3191-3194. 被引量:165
  • 2王佩燕.独特的急诊临床思维——降阶梯式鉴别诊断[J].世界急危重病医学杂志,2007,4(3):1828-1828. 被引量:56
  • 3中华人民共和国卫生部.急诊患者病情分级指导原则(征求意见稿)[J].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2011,4(4):241-243.
  • 4邱晓彦,陈丽琴,林瑗珠,等.台湾检伤分类新趋势.五级检伤分类系统[J].护理杂志,2008,55(3):87-91.
  • 5Ng C J, Yen ZS, Tsai JCH, et al. Validation of the Taiwan triage and acuity scale: a new computerized five-level triage system. Emerg Med J, 2011,28(12):1026-1031.
  • 6Meester KD, Das T, Hellemans K, et al. Impact of a standardized nurse observation protocol including MEWS after Intensive Care Unit discharge. Resuscitation, 2013,84(2):184-188.
  • 7Ng C J, Hsu KH, Kuan JT, et al. Comparison between Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and Taiwan Triage System in emergency departments. J Formos Med Assoc, 2010,109(11):828-837.
  • 8Twomey M, Wallis LA, Thompson ML, et al. The South African Triage Scale (adult version) provides reliable acuity ratings.Int Emerg Nuts, 2012,20(3):142-150.
  • 9曾灿辉,陈佩娟,郭萍.电子叫号系统在急诊科工作中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2008,5(20):26-28. 被引量:10
  • 10《中国重症患者转运指南(2010)》(草案)[J].中国危重病急救医学,2010,22(6):328-330. 被引量:258

共引文献232

同被引文献18

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部