双一流高校药学论文产出情况及高被引论文分析

Analysis on the output of pharmaceutical papers and highly cited papers in Double First-rate universities

目的通过对双一流高校药学论文的统计分析和高被引论文分析,了解我国药学研究发展现况,为高校更好地服务于国家创新战略提供思路。方法中文检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库,英文检索Scopus数据库,剔除重复的文献和非研究性文献。采用Excel 2016软件统计分析数据。结果对比2017至2019年与2014至2016年数据,发现国际刊Q1区和国内刊Q2区论文数量增长最为明显。高校作者在国际期刊上发表论文的热度不降反增;国内期刊论文数量不增微降。2014至2020年间,各高校在国内期刊上发表论文共计850篇,其中,高被引论文223篇,总被引频次2410次,篇均被引频次10.81次。结论尽管期刊界呼吁将创新科技成果发表在国内期刊上,但从本文的分析来看,这一趋势并未形成,因此,有必要进一步营造相应的学术生态,提升国内期刊的国际影响力。我国科技界与科技期刊界应当深度互融共生,相互促进发展。

Objective To understand the current situation of pharmaceutical research development in China and provide a constructive thinking for universities to serve the national innovation strategy through the statistical analysis of pharmaceutical papers and highly cited papers from Double First-rate universities.Methods CNKI,Wanfang,VIP and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched for Chinese publications,and Scopus database was searched for English publications.Duplicates and non-research literatures were excluded.Excel 2016 software was used for statistical data analysis.Results By comparing the data from 2017 to 2019 with that from 2014 to 2016,it was found that the number of papers in Q1 area from international journals and Q2 area from domestic journals increased significantly.The popularity of publishing papers in international journals by university authors was increasing.The number of publications in domestic journals slightly decreased.From 2014 to 2020,850 papers were published in domestic journals,among which 223 papers were highly cited,with a total cited times of 2410 and an average cited times per publication of 10.81.Conclusion In spite of the government’s encouragement to publish the scientific and technological achievements in domestic journals,no such trend was formed from our analysis.Therefore,it is necessary to further build the corresponding academic ecology and enhance the international influence of domestic journals.The science and technology circles and technology publication circles in China should be deeply integrated to promote mutual development.