摘要
萧绎的《金楼子》曾在学术史上备受“稗贩”与“类书”的讥评,但将《金楼子》与类书比较,可以发现无论是主题还是文本的整合方式,都有着本质上的不同。实际上,《金楼子》的记事部分更接近小说,而抄撮前代典籍与议论的部分,则可能是萧绎的读书笔记。与其将《金楼子》视作一部杂钞之作,不如说《金楼子》是一部“兼备众体”的子书。萧绎用灵活多样的写作方式,解构了先秦诸子以来子书以“立言”为主的著述方式。
In the academic history,Xiao Yi’s Jin Lou Zi has been criticized as“barnyard peddling”and a category book.However,compared with category book,Jin Lou Zi is quite different in terms of both theme and the method of combination of the text.In fact,the part of record of events in this book is closer to fiction,while the copy of previous books and some comments are most likely Xiao Yi’s reading notes.Jin Lou Zi should be considered as a comprehensive philosophical works instead of being regarded as a work of plagiarism.Xiao Yi deconstructed the writing style of“establishing speech”since the pre-Qin scholars with flexible and diversified writing styles.
出处
《南京师范大学文学院学报》
2021年第3期135-143,共9页
Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
基金
国家社科基金特别委托项目“中华传统文化的创造性转换与创新性发展”(项目号:15@ZH016)
山东大学基本科研业务费“中古子书的文体形式研究”(项目号:2019GN036)阶段性成果。
关键词
《金楼子》
类书
小说
笔记
综合性
Jin Lou Zi
category book
fiction
collections of notes
comprehensive