期刊文献+

单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值与社区获得性肺炎严重程度评分的关系 被引量:3

Relationship between monocyte to lymphocyte ratio and score for disease severity in patients with community-acquired pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)和社区获得性肺炎严重程度评分(CURB-65)之间的关系。方法回顾性分析安徽省第二人民医院2018年1月至2019年4月收治的82例社区获得性肺炎(CAP)病人、40例健康受试者的临床资料和实验室指标结果,根据CURB-65评分系统将82例CAP分为低危CAP组42例和中高危CAP组40例。采用希森美康全自动血细胞分析仪XT-4000i和全自动凝血分析仪CS-5100、日立全自动生化仪008AS检测各项实验室指标,采用回归和相关分析MLR与白细胞计数(WBC)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)和CURB-65评分的相关性,采用ROC曲线比较MLR、单核细胞计数(M)曲线下面积(AUC)评估其在预测CAP是否严重诊断中的预测效能。结果研究发现CAP病人的MLR(0.67±0.63)高于健康对照组(0.17±0.05)(P<0.05);低危CAP病人的MLR(0.45±0.29)高于对照组(0.17±0.05)(P<0.05),与低危CAP病人MLR(0.45±0.29)相比,中高危CAP病人的MLR(0.90±0.79)进一步升高(P<0.05);MLR与WBC、hs-CRP、FIB及CURB-65评分呈正相关(P<0.05);预测CAP严重的ROC曲线中,MLR的AUC大于M;MLR与CAP严重风险提高相关(OR=23.206,95%CI:1.339-402.275,P=0.031);结论MLR可能是评估CAP严重程度的新的炎症标志物,其快速、廉价、简便,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the relationship between monocyte to lymphocyte ratio(MLR)and community-acquired pneumonia severity score(CURB-65).Methods Clinical data and laboratory indicators of 82 patients with community-acquired pneumonia(CAP)and 40 healthy subjects admitted to Anhui No.2 Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2018 to April 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.Eighty-two patients with CAP were assigned into two groups according to the CURB-65 scoring system:the low-risk CAP group(42 cases)and the medium-high-risk CAP group(40 cases).The automatic blood cell analyzer XT-4000 i and automatic blood coagulation analyzer CS-5100 of SYSMEX,the automatic biochemical analyzer 008 AS of HITACHI were employed to detect laboratory indicators.Regression and correlation analysis were used to analyze the correlation among MLR,WBC,hs-CRP,FIB and CURB-65.The predictive efficacy of MLR,M in the diagnosis of severity of CAP was evaluated by comparing the area under the curve(AUC)of ROC curve.Results MLR(0.67±0.63)in patients with CAP were higher than that in the normal control group(0.17±0.05)(P<0.05).MLR(0.45±0.29)in patients with low-risk CAP were higher than that in the normal control group(0.17±0.05)(P<0.05).MLR(0.90±0.79)in patients with medium-high-risk CAP were further increased than that in patients with low-risk CAP(0.45±0.29)(P<0.05).MLR were positively correlated with WBC,hs-CRP,FIB and CURB-65 scores(P<0.05).In the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve for predicting severe CAP,the area under the curve(AUC)of MLR was greater than M.MLR was also an independent risk factor for severe CAP(OR=23.206,95%CI:1.339-402.275,P=0.031).Conclusion MLR,which may be a inflammatory markers that can be used to evaluate the severity of CAP,are rapidly detected,inexpensive and simple,and worthy of clinical application.
作者 潘荣 罗兵 孙敏捷 冯梅 霍星星 徐伟明 PAN Rong;LUO Bing;SUN Minjie;FENG Mei;HUO Xingxing;XU Weiming(Department of Medical Laboratory Center,Anhui No.2 Provincial People’s Hospital,Hefei,Anhui 230041,China;Department of Operating Room,Anhui No.2 Provincial People’s Hospital,Hefei,Anhui 230041,China;Department of Scientific Research Center,The Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Anhui Province,Hefei,Anhui 230020,China)
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2021年第10期1962-1966,共5页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(81803938) 安徽省教育厅高校科学研究重点项目(KJ2019A1099)。
关键词 社区获得性感染 肺炎 单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值 CAP严重程度 纤维蛋白原 超敏C反应蛋白 Community-acquired infections Pneumonia Monocyte to lymphocyte ratio Severity of community-acquired pneumonia Fibrinogen Hypersensitive C-reactive protein
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3041
  • 2Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectiuous Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults [ J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2007, 44 Suppl 2: $27-$72.
  • 3Milbrandt EB, Reade MC, Lee M, et al. Prevalence and significance of coagulation abnormalities in community-acquired pneumonia [ J ]. Mol Med, 2009, 15 (11-12) :438445.
  • 4Agapakis DI, Tsantilas D, Psarris P, et al. Coagulation and inflammation biomarkers may help predict the seventy of community acquired pneumonia [ J ]. Respirology, 2010, 15 ( 5 ) : 796 -803.
  • 5Fine M J, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia [J]. N Engl J ned, 1997, 336(4) : 243-250.
  • 6Wada H, Hatada T, Okamoto K, et al. Modified non-overt DICdiagnostic criteria predict the early phase of overt-DIC [ J ]. Am J Hematol, 2010, 85(9) : 691-694.
  • 7Querol-Ribelles JM, Tenas JM, Querol-Borrs JM, et al. Validation of the pneumonia severity index for hospitalizing patients with community-acquired pneumonia [ J ] Med Clin (Bare), 2004, 122(13) : 481-486.
  • 8Vandijck DM, Blot SI, De Waele JJ, et al. Thrombocytoenia and outcome in critically ill patients with bloodstream infection [ J ]. Heart Lung, 2010, 39 (1) :21-26.
  • 9Calkosinski I, Rosinczuk-Tonderys J, Dobrzynski M, et al. Occurrence of disseminated intravascular coagulation in 2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced pneumonia in the rat [ J ]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2013, 788:283-292.
  • 10Arslan S, Ugurlu S, Bulut G, et al. The association between plasma D-dimer levels and community acquired pneumonia [ J ]. Clinics ( Sao Paulo), 2010, 65 ( 6 ) : 593-597.

共引文献93

同被引文献40

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部