期刊文献+

2016-2020年中国银屑病临床试验质量评估 被引量:2

Quality assessment of clinical trials in psoriasis,2016-2020
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估2016-2020年国内外企业发起的临床试验的质量,为中国银屑病临床研究标准化构建提供参考。方法:从全球临床试验注册数据库、国家食品药品监督管理总局药品审评中心药物临床试验登记与信息公示平台、中国临床试验注册中心三个临床试验登记平台中提取2016年1月至2020年12月注册登记的银屑病治疗药物临床试验,对试验的规范性、方法学设计、研究终点指标进行分析。结果:2016-2020年国内外分别有123和314个临床试验信息,国内研究采用随机分配比例高于国外(91.9%比77.4%),而国内有49.6%试验<100人,这个比例稍高于国外(43.9%)。试验设计方面,国内外均常选择平行对照方法;国外有32.2%试验采取四盲设计,国内44.7%临床试验是双盲法。国外和国内各有28.0%和19.5%试验选择银屑病皮损面积及严重程度指数(PASI)做研究终点评价指标。结论:我国临床试验的质量已有很大程度提高,但和国际先进水平相比仍存在一定差距,应注重中国临床试验的设计与实施,提高中国临床试验的总体质量。 Objective:To evaluate the quality of clinical trials in domestic and foreign enterprises during 2016-2020,and to provide reference for the standardization construction of clinical research on psoriasis in China.Methods:The drug clinical trials of psoriasis treatment were researched from Clinicaltrial.gov,Registration and Information Disclosure Platorm of Cencer for Drug Evaluation of China Food and Drug Administration and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry from January 1,2016 to December 31,2020.The standardization,methodological design and endpoint index of the study were analyzed.Results:A total of 123 and 314 clinical trials at home and abroad were collected.The rate of random allocation in domestic studies was 91.9%,which was higher than that in foreign studies(77.4%).Howerver,the rate of cases fewer than 100 in domestic studies was 49.6%,which was higher than foreign studies(43.9%).Parallel control was the most common method at home and abroad.In foreign countries,32.2%of clinical trials were the four-blind design,and 44.7%of domestic clinical trials were double-blind.PASI as evaluation methods to access the efficacy in 19.5%of domestic studies and 28.0%of foreign studies.Conclusion:The quality of clinical trials in China has been greatly improved,but there is still a gap compared with the international advanced level.Attention should be paid to the design and implementation of clinical trials in China to improve the overall quality of clinical trials in China.
作者 朱蓓蓓 刘毅 李婧 宦静 倪琪 杨雪源 ZHU Beibei;LIU Yi;LI Jing;HUAN Jing;NI Qi;YANG Xueyuan(Department of Clinical Trial Institution,Institute of Dermatology,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Nanjing 210042,China)
出处 《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》 2021年第12期779-782,共4页 China Journal of Leprosy and Skin Diseases
基金 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程临床试验能力提升(GCP)平台建设项目(编号:2020-I2M-2-007)。
关键词 银屑病 临床试验 规范 质量评估 系统分析 psoriasis clinical trial norm quality evaluation systematic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1张林,黄继军.中国蒙古族银屑病流行调查报告[J].中华皮肤科杂志,1989,22(4):219-221. 被引量:5
  • 2Krueger G,Koo J,Lebwohl M,et al.The impact of psoriasis on quality of life:results of a 1998 National Psoriasis Foundation patientmembership survey[J].Arch Dermatol,2001,37(3):280-284.
  • 3Koo J.Population-based epidemiologic study of psoriasis with emphasis on quality of life assessment[J].Dermatol Clin,1996,14(3):485-496.
  • 4Koo J.Population-based epidemiologic study d psoriasis with emphasis on quality of life assessment[J].Dermatol Clin,1996,14(3):485-96.
  • 5Langley BG,Krueger GG,Griffiths CE.Psoriasis:epidemiology,clinical features,and quality of life[J].Ann Rheum Dis,2005,64(2):18-23.
  • 6Brasthen LR,Botten G,Bjerkedal T.Prevalence of psoriasis in Norway[J].Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh),1989,Suppl 142:5-8.
  • 7Ferrándiz C,Bordas X,Garcia-Patos V,et al.Prevalence of psoriasis in Spain (Epiderma Project:phase Ⅰ)[J].J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol,2001,15 (1):20-23.
  • 8Gelfand JM,Weinstein R,Porter SB,et al.Prevalence and treatment of psoriasis in the United Kingdom:a population-based study[J].Arch Dermatol,2005,141(12):537-541.
  • 9钱戊春.新疆地区银屑病调查报告.新疆医学院学报,1978,2:204-204.
  • 10李仪方,王秀英,叶月仙,刘福民.徐州市银屑病流行病学调查报告[J].徐州医学院学报,1998,18(2):107-108. 被引量:8

共引文献1068

同被引文献33

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部