摘要
作为文学研究与批评的主要路径,"阐论"和"诠证"彼此既独立又统一,二者的独立性形成文学批评的内在逻辑,统一性又为文学史的书写提供了参考和选择。这可为思考当代文学批评实践提供一种视角,考察其如何在不同的现实语境中展开,又呈现出怎样的文学史形态,面对文本和面对文化场域嬗变时的结构性区别是什么,以及在何种逻辑中组织批评和批评史,并最终如何进入知识的生产、传播与接受、参与作家作品的经典化过程。
Interpretation and exegesis,as major approaches to literary study and criticism,are bothindependent and unified with each other.They lend a perspective for practicing criticism on contemporary literature.How can interpretation and exegesis be exercised in different realistic contexts?What forms of literary history can they present?What structural differences will they cause in the face of evolving texts and cultural backdrops?What kind of logic is suitable for conducting criticism and writing history of criticism?Finally,scholars can look into the process of their involvement in knowledge production,dissemination,and acceptance as well as literary canonization.
出处
《中国文学批评》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第3期96-104,159,共10页
Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism
基金
山东大学未来学者计划及自由探索类项目(IFWF2020)阶段性成果。