“共鸣”何以超越“加速”:罗萨批判性美好生活观的逻辑演进

How“Resonance”Transcends“Acceleration”:the Logical Evolution of Rosa’s Critical View of Good Life

“美好生活”是哈特穆特·罗萨批判理论的研究主旨。罗萨在对“什么是美好的生活”“为什么生活不美好”以及“如何实现美好生活”这三个问题的理论诠释中形成了“批判性美好生活观”。其中,罗萨将美好生活定义为主体与世界的“共鸣”关系,这是其以往支持的“自治”基础上的发展,实现了对“什么是美好的生活”的建构性诠释的方法论转向。与此相应的是,罗萨在对“为什么生活不美好”的反思性诠释中经历了从“社会加速”到“动态稳定”的认知深化,但在这一过程中,“社会加速”未失去其核心地位,而是以“增长”“加速”“创新”的概念三元组呈现其核心内涵。针对现代社会的共鸣危机,罗萨提出了“后增长社会”这一社会形态范式,其核心旨向是以“适应性增长”模式代替“强迫性增长”模式,从而为如何走向美好生活提供一种社会构想。罗萨对美好生活的建构、反思与探索,虽不能在具体问题上为实现中国人民的美好生活提供既成方案,但仍不失为一种方法论启示。

“Good life”is the research theme of Hartmut Rosa’s critical theory.Rosa formed a“critical view of good life”in his theoretical interpretation of“what is good life”“why life is not good”and“how to realize good life”.Among them,Rosa defines good life as the“resonance”relationship between the subject and the world,which is the development based on the“autonomy”supported by Rosa in the past,and realizes the methodological turn of the constructive interpretation of“what is good life”.Correspondingly,Rosa experienced the cognitive deepening from“social acceleration”to“dynamic stability”in his reflective interpretation of“why life is not good”,but in this process,“social acceleration”did not lose its core position,but presented its core connotation with the concept triple of“growth”“acceleration”and“innovation”.In view of the resonance crisis of modern society,Rosa put forward the social form paradigm of“post growth society”,whose core purpose is to replace the“forced growth”model with the“adaptive growth”model,so as to provide a social idea on how to move towards good life.Rosa’s construction,reflection and exploration of good life can not provide a completed plan for the realization of the good life of the Chinese people on specific issues,but it is still a methodological enlightenment.