摘要
目的:对比分析内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)与冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)治疗结直肠息肉的效果。方法:2017年6月-2019年12月收治结直肠息肉患者60例,随机分为两组,各30例。试验组采用CSP治疗;对照组采用EMR治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:试验组手术治愈率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:应用CSP治疗结直肠息肉,有助于提高一次性治愈率,且并发症发生率较低。
Objective:To compare the efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and snare high-frequency electrocoagulation in the treatment of colorectal polyps.Methods:From June 2017 to December 2019,60 patients with colorectal polyp were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 30 patients in each group.The experimental group was treated with EMR;The control group was treated with endoscopic snare of high frequency electrocoagulation.The therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared.Results:The surgical cure rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of EMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps can improve the one-time cure rate and the complication rate is low.
作者
徐新国
乔燕
姜红香
Xu Xinguo;Qiao Yan;Jiang Hongxiang(Hospital of Xituan Town,Dafeng District,Yancheng City,Jiangsu Yancheng 224124)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2021年第28期70-71,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
结直肠息肉
内镜下黏膜切除术
冷圈套息肉切除术
Colorectal polyp
EMR
Snare high-frequency electrocoagulation and electroresection