期刊文献+

国内外加氢站安全间距分析研究 被引量:6

Analysis and Research on Safety Spacing of Hydrogen Refueling Stations at Home and Abroad
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对亚洲、欧洲、北美洲等国家和地区的加氢站比较研究,发现现阶段我国加氢站发展在安全间距、储氢方式、氢能管理等方面与国外存在的差异,同时指出我国标准制定过程中采用的汽油与氢气能量等价换算方法计算得出了过大的安全间距,这在一定程度上制约了我国加氢站的发展。研究了基于量化风险评价的加氢站安全间距计算方法,为加氢站安全间距的科学合理制修订提供了基础。 Through the comparative study of hydrogen refueling stations in Asia,Europe,North America and other countries and regions,it was found that there were many differences between the development of hydrogen refueling stations in China and foreign countries in safety distances,hydrogen storage mode,hydrogen energy management and so on.The gasoline and hydrogen energy equivalent conversion method applied in the process of my country′s standard formulation has calculated an excessively large safety distance,which has restricted the development of my country′s hydrogen refueling stations to a certain extent.The calculation method of the safety distance of hydrogen refueling stations based on quantitative risk assessment was studied,which provided a basis for the scientific and reasonable revision of the safety distance of hydrogen refueling stations.
作者 赵雯晴 Zhao Wenqing(SINOPEC Research Institute of Safety Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Shandong,Qingdao,266104)
出处 《安全、健康和环境》 2021年第9期24-27,共4页 Safety Health & Environment
基金 中国石化科技部项目(319011),加氢站高效储供氢及安全防控技术研究。
关键词 加氢站 安全间距 量化风险评价 泄漏概率 风险基准 hydrogen refueling station safety spacing quantitative risk assessment leakage probability risk acceptance guidelines
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献41

  • 1郑津洋,开方明,刘仲强,陈瑞,陈长聘.高压氢气储运设备及其风险评价[J].太阳能学报,2006,27(11):1168-1174. 被引量:25
  • 2毛宗强.氢能知识系列讲座(1) 氢能:人类未来的清洁能源——由《百年备忘录》说开去[J].太阳能,2007(1):9-11. 被引量:5
  • 3Norsk Hydro ASA, DNV. Risk acceptance criteria for hydrogen refueling stations[R].[S. l. ]:European Integrated Hydrogen Project 2, 2003.
  • 4LI Zhiyong, PAN Xiangmin, MA Jianxin. Harm effect distances evaluation of severe accidents for gaseous hydrogen refueling station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35(3) : 1515.
  • 5LI Zhiyong, PAN Xiangmin, MA Jianxin. Quantitative risk assessment on 2010 Expo hydrogen station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 20113 36(6):4079.
  • 6Lisa Callaghan Jerram , Anissa Dehamna. 2009 Hydrogen infrastructure survey [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-10-05 ] http://www. fuelcelltoday, corn/online/survey? survey = 2009-06/2009- Infrastructure-Survey-Free.
  • 7Matthijsen AJCM, Kooi E. S. Safety distances for hydrogen filling stations [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19: 719.
  • 8IGC Doc 75/07/E/rev. Determination of safety distances[S]. [S. l.]:European Industrial Gases Association, 2007.
  • 9Witlox HWM, Holt A. A unified model for jet, heavy and passive dispersion including droplet rainout and re-evaporation [C]// International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequences of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials, San Francisco, CCPS, 1999:315-344.
  • 10Baker WE, Kulesz, JJ, Richer RE, et al. Workbook for predicting pressure wave and fragment effects of exploding propellant tanks and gas storage vessels[R]. Washington: NASA Scientific and Technical Information Office, 1977.

共引文献131

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部