期刊文献+

考虑腐蚀作用下的铝合金三体船疲劳强度直接计算分析 被引量:1

Fatigue strength analysis of aluminum alloy trimaran considering corrosion effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]针对腐蚀环境下铝合金三体船的疲劳强度进行评估。[方法]以某120 m铝合金三体船为例,基于Miner线性累积损伤理论,运用直接计算法——谱分析法进行三体船疲劳寿命计算。同时,建立不同腐蚀模型,探讨不同腐蚀模型对三体船热点疲劳特性的影响。[结果]结果显示:新型腐蚀模型更符合结构的实际腐蚀过程且具有较好的适应性;不同腐蚀模型对铝合金三体船热点的疲劳影响程度与腐蚀年限有关;铝合金三体船在连接桥与主、侧体连接处其抗腐蚀疲劳强度能力较强。[结论]所得结论对考虑腐蚀环境下的三体船疲劳强度评估具有参考意义。 [Objective]This study evaluates the fatigue strength of an aluminum alloy trimaran in a corros-ive environment.[Method]Taking a 120 m aluminum alloy trimaran as an example,the direct calculation method/spectral analysis method is used to calculate its fatigue life based on Miner's linear cumulative dam-age theory.At the same time,four types of corrosion model are established to compare the hot spot fatigue strength calculation results under different corrosion models and explore the effects of corrosion on the fatigue life of the trimaran.[Results]The results show that the new corrosion model is closer to the actual corro-sion process.The effects of different corrosion models on the hot spots of the aluminum alloy trimaran are re-lated to corrosion years,and the fatigue strength of the connection between the cross-deck and the main and side bodies is strong.[Conclusion]The results of this study have reference significance for the fatigue as-sessment of trimarans in corrosive environments.
作者 周陈炎 张佳宁 陈玲 孟巧 ZHOU Chenyan;ZHANG Jianing;CHEN lin;MENG qiao(School of Electrical and Energy Engineering,Nantong institute of Technology,Nantong 226002,China;Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering College,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China)
出处 《中国舰船研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第5期189-196,共8页 Chinese Journal of Ship Research
基金 江苏省高等学校自然科学基金资助项目(18KJD580003) 南通市市级科技计划资助项目(JCZ20183)。
关键词 铝合金三体船 谱分析 腐蚀模型 抗腐蚀疲劳 aluminum alloy trimaran spectral analysis corrosion model corrosion fatigue resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1卢晓平,郦云,董祖舜.高速三体船研究综述[J].海军工程大学学报,2005,17(2):43-48. 被引量:45
  • 2郦云,卢晓平.高速三体船阻力性能研究[J].船舶力学,2007,11(2):191-198. 被引量:36
  • 3[1]Emi H,Kumano A,Baba N,Yamamoto N, Nakamura Y, Shihara H. A study on life assessment of ships and offshore structures (Part 1: Basic study) [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan 1991,169:443 - 454.
  • 4[2]EmiH, Yuasa M, Kumano A, Kumamoto N, Yamamoto N, Matsunaga M. A study on life assessment of ships and offshore structures(2nd report: Risk assessment of fatigue failures of hull structures) [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan 1992, 172:627 - 635.
  • 5[3]EmiH, Yuasa M, Kumano A, Arima T, Yamamoto N, Umino M. A study on life assessment of ships and offshore structures (3rd report: Corrosion control and condition evaluation for a long life service of the ship) [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan 1993, 174:735 - 744.
  • 6[4]RINA. Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Operation of Bulk Carriers[C]. London: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 1998.
  • 7[5]TSCF. Condition evaluation and maintenance of tank structures[Z]. Tanker Structure Co -operative Forum, Witherby, London,1992.
  • 8[6]TSCF. Guidance manual for tank structures[Z]. Tanker Structure Co -operative Forum, Witherby, London, 1997.
  • 9[7]Guedes Soares C, Ivanov L D. Time - dependent reliability of the primary ship structure[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1989, 26:59 - 71.
  • 10[8]Southwell C R, Bultman J D, Hummer Jr. CW. Estimating of service life of steel in seawater[M] .In: Schumacher M, editor.Seawater Corrosion Handbook. New Jersey: Noyes Data Corporation, 1979. 374 - 387.

共引文献35

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部