认罪认罚案件量刑建议精准化的证成及完善

Justification and Improvement of Sentencing Recommendationsfor Plea and Punishment Cases

认罪认罚案件中的量刑建议相较于传统量刑建议,“变”得是量刑建议的形成、精准度要求和法律约束力,“不变”的是其性质和根本属性。量刑建议精准化是落实认罪认罚从宽制度、促进庭审实质化的必然选择,取得了初步成效。但在实践中仍存在量刑规范不足、协商机制不彻底、审查及监督难等问题,应加快完善量刑指南、协商机制、社会调查报告等制度,推进认罪认罚案件量刑建议精准化改革进程。

Compared with traditional sentencing recommendations,sentencing recommendations in guilty plea cases have"changed"in terms of their formation,precision requirements and legal binding force,while"unchanged"in terms of their nature and fundamental attributes.The precision of sentencing suggestion is the inevitable choice to implement the leniency system of guilty plea and promote the substantiveness of court hearing,which has achieved preliminary results.However,in practice,there are still insufficient sentencing standards,incomplete consultation mechanism,difficult review and supervision and other problems.It is necessary to speed up the improvement of sentencing guidelines,consultation mechanism,social investigation report and other systems,and promote the reform process of accurate sentencing recommendations for guilty plea cases.