期刊文献+

心理模拟会让顾客欣喜吗?一个中介调节模型

Will Mental Simulation Make Customers Delighted?A Mediated Moderation Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过考察选择结果效价与顾客欣喜之间的作用机理,阐释心理模拟能否让顾客更欣喜的问题.采用模拟情境实验设计和回归分析方法对研究假设进行验证,结果表明心理模拟调节选择结果效价与顾客欣喜之间的关系,即在关注结果心理模拟下好坏结果间欣喜的差异显著小于关注过程心理模拟下好坏结果间欣喜的差异.期望不一致中介选择结果效价与顾客欣喜之间的关系,且选择结果效价与心理模拟的交互作用通过期望不一致中介影响顾客欣喜.本研究为网上商家驱动顾客欣喜提供了新视角和思路. By examining the mechanism between outcome valence and customer delight,it explains whether mental simulation can make customers more delighted.The research hypothesis was validated using the simulated situational experimental design and regression analysis methods.The results showed that the relationship between mental simulation adjustment outcome valence and customer delight,that is,the difference between good and bad results under the mental simulation of attention result is significantly smaller than the difference between good and bad results under the mental simulation of attention process.The relation between outcome valence and customer delight was selected by the mediation role of expectation discrepancy.The interaction between outcome valence and mental simulation affects customer delight through the mediation of expectation discrepancy.This research provides new perspectives and ideas for online retailers to drive customer delight.
作者 张跃先 于佩玉 杨勇 ZHANG Yue-xian;YU Pei-yu;YANG Yong(School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China;School of Management,Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao,Qinhuangdao 066004,China)
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第10期1514-1520,共7页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 河北省自然科学基金面上资助项目(G2019501054) 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(71972033).
关键词 心理模拟 结果效价 顾客欣喜 期望不一致 中介调节模型 mental simulation outcome valence customer delight expectation discrepancy mediated moderation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):448-452. 被引量:733
  • 2[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 3[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 4[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 5[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 6[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 7[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 8[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 9[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 10[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74

共引文献7870

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部