期刊文献+

用户知识付费参与决策的三类信息作用机制研究 被引量:1

Study on the Action Mechanism Among the Three Types of Information for Users’Knowledge Payment Decision
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对知识付费的兴起,本文基于商品交易时信息不对称问题中的三类信号信息,构建了知识付费平台用户行为的理论模型,探究了三类信息间的作用关系,尤其关注了平台方认证的标识信息对用户参与行为的影响。实证结果表明,来源于知识付费产品和知识提供者的评分信息与声誉信息均显著正向影响知识获取者的参与行为,平台认证的标识信息并没有直接影响用户决策,而是通过影响用户对其他两类信息的可信度间接产生影响,即起到了调节效应,表明以平台认证的标识确实会影响用户行为,有一定的治理作用。 With the emerging of paid knowledge products,this paper constructs a research model based on the three types of information from the information asymmetry problem in transactions to explore the relationships among them,especially the influence of platform authentication on the payment behavior.The empirical results show that the review score from the paid knowledge products and the reputation from paid knowledge product provider are both significantly positive with users’payment behavior,while the platform authentication does not directly influence users’decision and does indirectly influence by influencing the reliability of the other two types of information,which is that moderating effects.The result also indicates the platform authentication really influences the users’payment behavior and has some degree of governance effects.
作者 苗虹 赵冰洁 王念新 葛世伦 MIAO Hong;ZHAO Bingjie;WANG Nianxin;GE Shilun(School of Economics&Management,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang 212003,China)
出处 《信息系统学报》 2021年第2期26-38,共13页 China Journal of Information Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71971101,71972090) 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(SJKY19_2600)。
关键词 知识付费 信息信号 平台认证 治理 调节效应 Paid-Knowledge Information Signal Heuristic-Systematic Model Platform Governance Moderating Effect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献53

  • 1王君珺,闫强.不同热度搜索型产品的在线评论对销量影响的实证研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(S2):406-411. 被引量:48
  • 2周波.知识交易的定价[J].经济研究,2007,42(4):79-89. 被引量:30
  • 3Cabrera A, Cabrera E F. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas [J]. Organization studies , 2002 (5) : 687-710.
  • 4Cheung CMK, Lee MKO. What drives members to continue sharing knowledge in a virtual professional community? The role of knowledge self-efficacy and satisfaction [M]//Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007: 472-484.
  • 5Chiu CM, Wang ETG, Shih FJ, et al. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of expectancy disconfirmation and justice theories . Online Information Review, 2011 (1) : 134-153.
  • 6Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion [J]. Journal ofPersonaliW and Social Psycholo- gy, 1980 (5): 752-766.
  • 7Wirth W, B?cking T, Kamowski V, et al. Heuristic and systematic use of search engines [1]. Computer-Me- diatedCommunication, 2007 (3): 778-800.
  • 8Lucassen T, Noordzij M L, Schraagen J M. Reference blindness: The influence of references on trust in Wikipedia [C]// Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference Germany, 2011: 1-4.
  • 9Zhang K Z K, Zhao S J, Cheung C M K, et al. Lee. Examining the influence of online reviews on con- sumers' decision-making: A heuristic systematic model[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2014 (67) : 78-89.
  • 10Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model [J]. MIS quarterly, 2001 : 351-370.

共引文献130

同被引文献56

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部