期刊文献+

脓毒症基础研究的进展及未来方向 被引量:15

Current progress and future directions of basic research on sepsis
原文传递
导出
摘要 脓毒症为机体对感染的反应失调而导致危及生命的器官功能障碍,其发病机制复杂,病死率高。深入开展基础研究是突破脓毒症临床诊疗"瓶颈"的重要途径之一,然而当前基础研究面临异质性高、转化难的困境。因此,本文将着手分析脓毒症基础研究领域当前取得的进展及面临的挑战,并展望未来,细胞功能、能量代谢、微生物群、表观遗传学及脓毒症恢复期等方面或可作为重点研究方向。 Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection,of which the pathogenesis is complex and the mortality rate is high.However,current basic research is facing the dilemma of high heterogeneity and difficult translation to clinical practice.In-depth basic research is one of the most important ways to break through the"bottleneck"of clinical diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.The purpose of this review is to analyze the current progress and challenges in the field of basic research on sepsis,and look forward to the potential research directions in the future.Cell function,energy metabolism,microbiota,epigenetics and recovery period of sepsis may be the research priorities.
作者 张笑婷 纪文焘 薄禄龙 卞金俊 邓小明 Zhang Xiaoting;Ji Wentao;Bo Lulong;Bian Jinjun;Deng Xiaoming(Faculty of Anesthesiology,the First Affiliated Hospital,Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《中华危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第8期919-921,共3页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(81671887) 上海市青年科技启明星计划项目(19QA1408500)。
关键词 脓毒症 基础研究 微生物群 表观遗传 Sepsis Research Microbiota Epigenetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third In- ternational Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA,2016,315(8):801-810. DOI:I0.1001/ jama. 2016.0287.
  • 2Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock : for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [J]. JAMA,2016,315(8):775-787. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
  • 3Seymour CW, Liu VX, lwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clln- ical criteria for sepsis: for the Third International Consensus Def- initions tbr Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [ J]. JAMA, 2016,315(8) :762-774.D01: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
  • 4Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. American Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure lines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis [ J ] Med, 1992,20(6) : 864-874.
  • 5College of Consensus and guide- Crit Care Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. International Sepsis Definitions Conference. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS In- ternational Sepsis Definitions Conference [ J]. Intensive Care Med, 2003,29 (4) : 530-538.
  • 6Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, et al. Systemic inflam- matory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2015,372(17) : 1629-1638. DOI: 10. 1056/NEJMoa- 1415236.
  • 7Vincent JL, Mira JP, Antonelli M. Sepsis: older and newer concepts. Lancet Respir Med, 2016, 4 ( 3 ) : 237-240. DOI: 10. 1016/$2213-2600( 15)00522-6.
  • 8Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2015,372(14) : 1301-1311.DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896.
  • 9ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinieal Trials Group, Peake SL, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock[ J]. N Engl J Med,2014,371 (16) : 1496-1506.DOI: 10. 1056/NEJMoa1404380.
  • 10ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, et al. A ran- domized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock [ J ] N Engl J Med,2014,370(18): 1683-1693. DOI: 10.1056/NEJ- Moa1401602.

共引文献159

同被引文献122

引证文献15

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部