期刊文献+

比较优化STIR和IDEAL两种脂肪抑制技术在金属植入物MRI的应用价值 被引量:4

Comparison of the Value of Optimized STIR and IDEAL Fat Suppression Techniques in MRI of Patients with Metal Implants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较优化短反转恢复(Short TI Inversion Recovery,STIR)和三点非对称法脂肪抑制技术(Iterative Dixon of Water-fat with Echo Asymmetry and Least-squares Estimation,IDEAL)对金属植入物磁共振成像(Magnetic Resonance Imaging,MRI)图像质量的影响。方法选取腰椎金属内固定术后需行MRI检查的患者30例,行常规序列以及优化STIR、IDEAL序列扫描,通过对感兴趣区信号的强度值分别计算信噪比(Signal to Noise Ratio,SNR)和信噪比(Contrast to Noise Ratio,CNR),对数据结果做统计学分析;对脂肪抑制均匀性、金属伪影大小进行主观评价。结果优化STIR和IDEAL两种方法图像信噪比分别为:19.26±0.96、20.26±1.24(t=-2.94,P<0.01);图像噪声比分别为:7.03±0.94、8.28±0.97(t=-6.07,P<0.01);主观评分脂肪抑制的均匀性分别为:3.47±0.51、3.63±0.50(t=1.37,P>0.05);金属伪影的大小分别为:3.68±0.67,3.74±0.65(t=-0.57,P>0.05)。结论IDEAL技术在脂肪抑制均匀性、金属伪影、图像信噪比等图像质量方面和优化STIR脂肪抑制技术相当,并且可以得到更好的SNR和CNR。因此在机器条件允许的情况下,对于金属植入物的患者可以选择IDEAL脂肪抑制技术进行检查。 Objective To compare the effects of optimized short TI inversion recovery(STIR)and iterative dixon of water-fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation(IDEAL)fat suppression technique on MRI image quality of metal implants.Methods Thirty patients requiring MRI examination after lumbar metal fixation were selected for routine,optimized STIR and IDEAL sequence scan.The signal to noise ratio(SNR)and contrast to noise ratio(CNR)of region of interests signal intensity were calculated and statistically analyzed.The uniformity of fat inhibition and the size of metal artifact were subjectively evaluated.Results The SNR of optimized STIR and IDEAL fat suppression methods were:19.26±0.96,20.26±1.24(t=-2.94,P<0.01);The CNR of the images were:7.03±0.94,8.28±0.97(t=-6.07,P<0.01).Subjective scoring uniformity of fat suppression were:3.47±0.51,3.63±0.50(t=1.37,P>0.05);the size of image metal artifacts were:3.68±0.67,3.74±0.65(t=-0.57,P>0.05).Conclusion IDEAL technology is comparable to STIR fat suppression technology in terms of fat suppression uniformity,metal artifacts,image signal-to-noise ratio,and results in better SNR and CNR.Therefore,if the machine conditions allows,patients with metal implants can choose IDEAL fat transplantation technology for examination.
作者 刘杰 王传兵 陈晓宇 LIU Jie;WANG Chuanbing;CHEN Xiaoyu(Department of Radiology,Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210008,China;Department of Radiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210029,China;Suzhou GEMMED Medical Equipment Co.,Ltd.,Zhangjiagang Jiangsu 215625,China)
出处 《中国医疗设备》 2021年第10期59-62,89,共5页 China Medical Devices
关键词 短反转恢复脂肪抑制技术 三点非对称法脂肪抑制技术 金属植入物 金属伪影 磁共振成像 short TI inversion recovery iterative dixon of water-fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation metal implants metal artifacts magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1严望军,刘铁龙,李家顺,贾连顺,章允志.腰椎关节突关节骨性关节炎对腰椎稳定性的影响[J].脊柱外科杂志,2003,1(5):278-282. 被引量:8
  • 2鲜军舫,王振常,燕飞,安裕志,李彬,史季桐,杨本涛,李冬梅,刘中林,田其昌,张燕明.眼部病变影像诊断的分析思路及策略[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(12):1427-1431. 被引量:13
  • 3Cooper H J, Ranawat AS, Potter I-IG, et aL Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of hip pain after to- tal hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(5): 661-667.
  • 4Hirasawa Y, Bashir WA, Smith FW, et ol. Postural changes of the dural sac in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic indi- viduals using positional stand-up magnetic resonance imag- ing[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(4): E136-E1g0.
  • 5Sekhon LH, Duggal N, Lynch JJ, et d. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan,Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(6): 673-680.
  • 6Sutter R, Ulbrich EJ, Jellus V, et al. Reduction of metal arti- facts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encod- ing metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2012, 265(1): 204-214.
  • 7Knight SR, Aujla R, Biswas SP. Total Hip Arthroplasly--over 100 years of operative history[J]. Orthop Rev(Pavia), 2011, 3(2): e16-e16.
  • 8Alyas F, Saifuddin A, Connell D. MR imaging evaluation of the bone marrow and marrow infiltrative disorders of the lumbar spine[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2007, 15(2): 199-219.
  • 9Weininger M, Lauterbach B, Knop S, et al. Whole-body MRI of multiple myeloma: comparison of different MRI sequences in assessment of different growth patterns[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 69(2): 339-345.
  • 10Harris CA, White LM. Metal artifact reduction in musculoskele- tal magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Orthopedic Clin North Am, 2006, 37(3):. 349-359.

共引文献24

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部