论类似商品或服务的认定标准

On Identification Standard of Similar Goods or Services

类似商品或服务的认定在商标授权确权、商标侵权认定中具有重要价值。而我国现有商标法律制度对商品或服务类似与否缺乏一致性的认定标准,导致在实践中不同机构之间常作出截然相反的认定结果。从理论层面探析,无外乎规范上认定类似商品或服务的标准张力不足,将混淆这一主观因素作为认定原则存在逻辑悖论,以及在实践中《商标注册用商品和服务国际分类表》与《类似商品和服务区分表》显露出效力困境。针对类似商品或服务的认定标准的不足,文章从规范路径、程序机制、司法角度提出完善建议。

The identification of similar goods or services is of great value in trademark authorization and trademark infringement.However,the existing trademark legal system in China lacks a consistent standard to determine whether goods or services are similar or not,which leads to the opposite result between different organizations in practice.From the theoretical perspective,there is the lack of tension in the standard of identifying similar goods or services at the normative level,a logical paradox in taking the subjective factor of confusion as the identification principle and the effectiveness dilemma in the practice of classification table and differentiation table.In view of the deficiencies of the standards for the identification of similar goods or services,this paper puts forward some suggestions from the perspective of normative path,procedural mechanism and justice.