期刊文献+

后腹腔镜切开取石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的临床效果 被引量:1

Clinical Effect of Retroperitoneoscopic Ureterolithotomy for Incarcerated Upper Ureteral Calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的临床效果。方法:2016年10月至2020年3月我院187例后腹腔镜输尿管上段切开取石术,178例为单侧输尿管结石,9例为双侧输尿管结石,结石直径为15~25 mm。结果:1例中转开放手术,其余186例均获成功,手术时间(62.3±22.1)min,术中出血量(30.2±5.3)mL,术后引流管拔除时间(4.6±3.2)d,9例术后出现尿漏。结论:后腹腔镜下输尿管上段切开取石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石安全、有效,结石清除率高,是一种输尿管上段嵌顿结石治疗的有效途径。 [Objective]To evaluate the clinical of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for incarcerated upper ureteral calculi.[Method]From October 2016 to March 2020,187 cases of upper ureteral stones were treated in our hospital under retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery,single ureteral calculi(n=178),multiple ureteral calculi(n=9).The stone size ranged from 13 to 25 mm.[Result]One case was converted into open operation and the remaining 186 cases were treated successfully with an operative duration of 62.3±22.1 min and volume of blood loss at(30.2±5.3)mL.The period of drainage tube was 4 days.Urinary leakage occurred in nine cases.[Conclusion]The retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is safe and effective with high stone clearance rate.
作者 朱庆峰 武晓敏 丁佳锋 ZHU Qingfeng;WU Xiaomin;DING Jiafeng(Lishui Central Hospital,Zhejiang 323000,China)
机构地区 丽水市中心医院
出处 《浙江医学教育》 2021年第5期61-63,共3页 Zhejiang Medical Education
关键词 输尿管嵌顿结石 腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术 incarcerated upper ureteral calculi retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1Juan YS, Shen JT, Li CC, et al. Comparison of percutaneous rtephrnlithotomy and ureteroscopic hthotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones [ J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2008, 24(4) : 204 -209.
  • 2Aravantinos E, Anagnostou T, Samarinas M, et al. Two-step minipercutaneous ureterolithotripsy under multimodal analgesia for complicated impacted calculi in proximal ureter [ J]. Urology, 2013, 81(6) : 1147 -1152.
  • 3Cengiz K, Berkan R, Mirze B, etal. Efficacy of a percutaneous antegrade approach for the treatment of large upper ureteral stones : single-center experience [ J ]. Turkish J Urol, 2011, 37 ( 3 ) : 210 -216.
  • 4Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, et al. Percutaneous antegrade re- moval of impacted upper-ureteral calculi : still the treatment of choice in developing countries[J]. J Endouml, 2005, 19(1) : 54 -57.
  • 5Rabani SM, Moosavizadeh A. Management of large proximal ureteral stones: a comparative clinical trial between transureteral !.ithotripsy ( TUL ) and shock wave lithotripsy ( SWL ) [ J ]. Nephrourol Mon, 2012, 4(3) : 556 -559.
  • 6Kijvikai K, Haleblian GE, Preminger GM, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited[J]. J Urol, 2007, 178(4 Pt 1) : 1157 -1163.
  • 7Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, et al. Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors [ J ]. J Urol, 2001, 166 (2) : 538 -540.
  • 8Tunc L, Kupeli B, Senoeak C, et al. Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment [ J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2007, 39(3): 759-764.
  • 9E1-Nahas AR, E1-Tabey NA, Eraky I, et al. Semirigid ureterosco- py for ureteral stones : a multivariate analysis of unfavorable results [J]. J Urol, 2009, 181(3) : 1158 -1162.
  • 10Hong YK, Park DS. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss lithoclast for treatment of ureteral calcuh : 12-years experience[ J]. J Kore- an Med Sci, 2009, 24(4) : 690 -694.

共引文献73

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部