期刊文献+

企业决策逻辑对企业绩效的影响研究 被引量:2

Research on the Influence of Enterprise Decision Logic on Enterprise Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 按照环境动态性和企业发展阶段划分出4个决策情境,研究不同情境下决策逻辑如何影响企业绩效。研究表明:情境1中(低环境动态性,新创企业),效果逻辑、因果逻辑对企业绩效均具有积极影响,二者的影响差异不大,且二者的交互效应具有更强的积极影响;情境2中(低环境动态性,成熟企业),效果逻辑对企业绩效不具有积极影响,因果逻辑对企业绩效具有积极影响,且因果逻辑的影响比在新创企业中更强;情境3中(高环境动态性,新创企业),效果逻辑对企业绩效具有积极影响,因果逻辑对企业绩效具有消极影响;情境4中(高环境动态性,成熟企业),效果逻辑对企业绩效具有积极影响,因果逻辑对企业绩效不具有消极影响,且效果逻辑的影响在新创和成熟企业之间不具有明显差异。 In this paper,according to the environmental dynamics and the growth stage,four different decision-making situations are divided to study the influence of decision logic on enterprise performance.The research shows that in scenario 1(low environmental dynamics,start-ups),effectuation and causation all have a positive impact on enterprise performance,there is no significant difference between them,and the interaction effect of them has a stronger positive impact on enterprise performance.In scenario 2(low environmental dynamics,mature enterprises),effectuation has no positive impact on enterprise performance,while causation has a positive effect on enterprise performance,and the impact of causation is stronger than that of start-ups.In scenario 3(high environmental dynamics,start-ups),effectuation has a positive impact on enterprise performance,while causation has a negative impact on enterprise performance.In scenario 4(highly dynamic environment,mature enterprise),effectuation positively affects the enterprise performance,while causation has no negative impact on enterprise performance,and the effectuation has no significant difference between start-ups and mature enterprises.
作者 马鸿佳 郎春婷 肖彬 MA Hongjia;LANG Chunting;XIAO Bin(Jilin University,Changchun,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第10期1453-1461,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71972084,71672072) 吉林大学重点研究基地资助重大项目(2019XXJD02)。
关键词 效果逻辑 因果逻辑 企业绩效 环境动态性 新创企业 effectuation causation enterprise performance environmental dynamics start-ups
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献59

  • 1Sarasvathy S D. How do firms come to be? Towards a theory of the prefirm[D]. Carnegie Mellon University,1998.
  • 2Sarasvathy S D. Causation and effectuation., toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001,26(2):243-263.
  • 3Read S,Sarasvathy S D. Knowing what to do and doing what you know:Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise [J]. Journal of Private Equity, 2005,9(1):45-62.
  • 4Fredrickson J W, Mitchell T R. Strategic decision processes : Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1984,27:399-423.
  • 5Fredrickson J W, Iaquinto T L. Inerta and creeping rationality in strategic decision processes [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989,32:516-542.
  • 6Brews P, Hunt M. Learning to plan and planning to learn: Resolving the planning school/learning school debate [J].Strategic Management Journal, 1999 (2): 889-913.
  • 7Goll I,Rasheed A. Rational decision making and firm performance: The moderating role of environment [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,18(7) : 583- 591.
  • 8Miller C C,Cardinal L B. Strategic planning and firm performance[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1994,37(6) : 1649-1665.
  • 9Baron R. Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1998,13:275-294.
  • 10Simon M, Houghton S M. The relationship among biases, mispereeptions, and the introduction of pioneering products: Examining differences in venture decision Contexts [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2002 ,Winter: 105-124.

共引文献125

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部