期刊文献+

复杂物流系统内稳定与动态的悖论关系案例研究 被引量:4

A Case Study on the Paradoxical Relationship between Stability and Dynamics within a Complex Logistic System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于苏宁物流案例,从悖论视角出发,在识别复杂物流系统内部稳定和动态机制的基础上,探索两者间相互促进机理,构建复杂物流系统内稳定与动态的悖论关系模型。研究表明:稳定机制和动态机制共存于复杂物流系统中,共同确保系统的高效运行;复杂物流系统中的稳定和动态机制呈现相互促进关系,即稳定过程机制能够支撑动态结果,动态过程机制能够支撑稳定结果;不同稳定过程机制对动态结果的作用机理存在差异性,不同动态过程机制对稳定结果的作用机理亦不尽相同。 Based on a case study on Suning Logistics,from the perspective of paradox,this study attempts to identify the internal stability and dynamics mechanisms among the complex logistics system,explore the mutual promotion mechanism between them,and build a paradoxical relationship model.The result shows that stability and dynamics mechanisms coexist in complex logistics systems,which ensures the efficient operation of the system.The stability and dynamics mechanisms in complex logistics systems show an interdependent relationship.That is,stability process mechanisms can support dynamics results,and dynamics process mechanisms can support stability results.Different process mechanisms of stability have different effects on dynamics results while different process mechanisms of dynamics have different effects on stability results.
作者 林海芬 郭珊杉 胡严方 LIN Haifen;GUO Shanshan;HU Yanfang(Dalian University of Technology,Dalian,Liaoning,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第9期1265-1275,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71572025,71872026) 辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”青年拔尖人才资助项目(XLYC1907125)。
关键词 复杂物流系统 稳定机制 动态机制 悖论关系 complex logistics system stability mechanism dynamics mechanism paradox relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献55

  • 1张祥龙.胡塞尔、海德格与东方哲学[J].中国社会科学,1993(6):45-55. 被引量:5
  • 2叶康涛.案例研究:从个案分析到理论创建——中国第一届管理案例学术研讨会综述[J].管理世界,2006,22(2):139-143. 被引量:55
  • 3GUMMESSON E. Qualitative Methods in Manage- ment Research [M]. California, Sage publications, 2000.
  • 4ADAMS G B,WHITE J D. Dissertation Research in Public Administration and Cognate Fields: An As- sessment of Methods and Quality[J]. Public Adminis- tration Review, 1994,54(6) : 565576.
  • 5YIN R K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods [M].3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
  • 6HEATH H, COWLEY S. Developing a Crounded Theory Approach: A Comparison of Glaser and Strauss [J]. International Journal of Nursing Stud- ies, 2007,41(2) :141150.
  • 7HOXJ J, BOEIJE H R. Data Collection, Primary vs. Secondary [J]. Encyclopedia of Social Measure- ment, 2005(1) :593599.
  • 8RANDALL D M, FEMANDES M F. The Social De sirahility Response Bias in Ethics Research[J]. Jour- nal of Business Ethics, 1991,10(10):805817.
  • 9ROBERTSON D C. Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Derections[J] Journal of Busi- aess Ethics, 1993,12(8):585599.
  • 10DALTON D R, METZGER M B. Towards Can- dor, Cooperation Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Response Tech- nique(RRT) [J]. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1992,2 (2) :207221.

共引文献85

同被引文献66

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部