期刊文献+

典型水声信道盲均衡算法比较研究

Comparative of Typical Blind Equalization Algorithms for Underwater Acoustic Channels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水声通信系统因所处的环境复杂,水声信道均衡是一个非常重要的环节,在简介典型的4种盲均衡算法原理的基础上,即最小均方恒模算法(Least Mean Square Constant Modulus Alogorithm,LMS-CMA)、修正恒模算法(Modified Constant Modulus Alogorithm,MCMA)、判决引导(Decision Directed,DD)算法、双模式切换算法等,采用典型实数水声信道和混合相位的复数水声信道两种模型进行仿真测试,实验结果表明,相对于LMS-CMA和MCMA算法,双模式切换算法具有更快的收敛速度和更小的稳态剩余误差;相对于DD算法,双模式算法具有更佳的稳健性. Because of the complexity of underwater environment,underwater acoustic channel equalization is a very important part of underwater acoustic communication system.In this paper,four typical blind equalization algorithms are briefly introduced:Least Mean Square Constant Modulus Alogorithm(LMS-CMA),Modified Constant Modulus Alogorithm(MCMA),Decision Directed(DD)algorithm and dual-mode switching algorithm,and then typical underwater acoustic real channel and mixed-phase complex underwater acoustic channel are adopted for simulation test.Experimental results show that the dual-mode switching algorithm has faster convergence speed and smaller steady-state residual error than LMS-CMA and MCMA algorithms,and has better robustness than DD algorithm.
作者 吕志胜 封斌 谭丽 刘世安 闫瑞瑞 LV Zhi-sheng;FENG Bin;TAN Li;LIU Shi-an;YAN Rui-rui(Information and Communication Engineering College,Guangzhou Maritime University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510725,China)
出处 《广州航海学院学报》 2021年第3期82-86,共5页 Journal of Guangzhou Maritime University
基金 广州市基础研究计划基础与应用基础研究项目(202002030341) 广东省教育厅重点平台和科研项目特色创新类项目(2018KTSCX167) 广东省教育厅重点平台和科研项目特色创新类项目(2018KTSCX171)。
关键词 水声信道盲均衡 LMS-CMA算法 MCMA算法 DD算法 双模式切换算法 underwater acoustic channel equalization least mean square constant modulus alogorithm modified constant modulus alogorithm decision directed algorithm dual-mode switching algorithm
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献61

  • 1徐金标,葛建华,王新梅.一种新的盲均衡算法[J].通信学报,1995,16(3):78-81. 被引量:26
  • 2郭业才,张艳萍.采用判决圆判决的双模式常模盲均衡算法[J].数据采集与处理,2007,22(3):278-281. 被引量:9
  • 3DENIS B, PIERROT J B. Joint distributed synchronization and positioning in UWB ad hoc networks using TOA[J]. IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2006, 154(4):1896-1911.
  • 4DANG U L, RUDER M A, SCHOBER R, et al. MMSE beamforming for SC-FDMA transmission over MIMO ISI channels[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2011,2011: 7.
  • 5BIANCHI P, LOUBATON P. On the blind equalization of continuous phase modulated signals using the constant modulus criterion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2007, 55(3): 1047-1061.
  • 6BARHUMI I, MOONEN M. Time-varying FIR equalization for MIMO transmission over doubly selective channels[J] IEEE Global Communications Conference, New Orleans, USA, 2008, 40(4): 382-388.
  • 7WU J, ZHENG Y R. Low complexity soft-input soft-output block decision feedback equalization[J]. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 2008, 26(2): 281-289.
  • 8BALTAR L G, WALDHAUSER D S, NOSSEK J A. MMSE subchannel decision feedback equalization for filter bank based multicarrier systems[C]. Circuits and Systems, 2009. ISCAS 2009. IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 2009: 2802-2805.
  • 9STOJANOVIC M. Adaptive channel estimation for underwater acoustic MIMO OFDM systems[C].Digital Signal Processing Workshop and 5th IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop, 2009. DSP/SPE 2009. IEEE 13th. IEEE, 2009: 132-137.
  • 10WONG K L J, RYLYAKOV A, YANG C K K. A 5-mW 6-Gb/s quarter-rate sampling receiver with a 2-tap DFE using soft decisions[J].IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 2007, 42(4):881-880.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部