期刊文献+

新时期我国投资待遇发展之检视

Investigation of Investment Treatment Development in the New Era in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 21世纪在经济全球化背景下,投资协定实践有了显著发展,其中投资待遇条款出现高标准趋势。我国双边投资协定(BIT)开始全面接受国际投资争端解决中心(ICSID)管辖,但却没有诸如“逐案审批同意”“当地救济优先”“东道国法律适用”“重大安全例外”“审慎金融监管”等安全阀。阿根廷如潮官司尚在眼前,前车之鉴,我们必须结合国际投资仲裁实践,审视自己的投资待遇条款,指导以后签订的投资协定。 In the 21st century,under the background of economic globalization,the practice of investment treaty has developed significantly,among which the investment treatment clause has a tendency of high standard.China's Bilateral Investment Treaty(BIT)has begun to fully accept the jurisdiction of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes(ICSID),but there is no safety valves such as"case-by-case approval","local relief priority","application of the law of the host country","major security exception"and"prudential financial regulation".The flood of lawsuits in Argentina is still at hand,so we must combine the practice of international investment arbitration to review our own investment treatment clauses and guide the investment treaties to be signed in the future.
作者 梅中伟 MEI Zhong Wei(Shenzhen Pingshan District Party School)
出处 《中国商论》 2021年第20期84-88,共5页 China Journal of Commerce
关键词 投资待遇 双边投资协定 投资争端仲裁 投资待遇立场 待遇条款 investment treatment Bilateral Investment Treaty(BIT) investment dispute arbitration position of investment treatment treatment clause
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献130

  • 1Wang Qishan,Vice Premier of the People’s Republic of China.G20 Must Look Beyond the Needs Of the Top 20[J].Beijing Review,2009,52(14):4-4. 被引量:1
  • 2杜小林.良治还是良政?——非洲国家如何治国理政[J].当代世界,2004(9):22-23. 被引量:1
  • 3徐崇利.从实体到程序:最惠国待遇适用范围之争[J].法商研究,2007,24(2):41-50. 被引量:38
  • 4J. Kalieki &. S. Medeiros, Fair, Equitable and Ambiguous: What Is Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law?, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 22, 2007.
  • 5T. J. Westcott, Recent Practice on Fair and Equitabie Treatment, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 8, 2007.
  • 6International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. United Mexican States, http://ita. law. uvic. ca/documents/ThunderbirdAward. pdf, 2009- 12- 24.
  • 7Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12.
  • 8B. Choudhury, Evolution or Devoluton? Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.
  • 9C. Schreuer, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.
  • 10OECD, International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape, Chapter 3-Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law, 2005, pp. 103- 124 .

共引文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部