2Hara T, Yamada S, Hayashi T, et aL Accuracy of nonstenolic coronary alherosclerosis assessment by multi-detector computed tomography. Circ J, 2007, 71:911-914.
3Pflederer T, Schmid M, Ropers D, et aJ. Interobserver variability of 64-slice computed tomography for the quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Rofo, 2007, 179 : 953 -957.
4Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Chihara R, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native cornary arteries using 64-slice muhidetector computed tomograptly. Am Heart J, 2007, 154: 519-526.
5Ong K, Chin SP, Chan WL, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of 64-row MDCT coronary imaging from a centre with early experience: a review and comparison with established centres. Med J Malaysia, 2005, 60: 629-636.
6Fleichmann D. Presenl and future trends in multiple detector-row CT apphcations: CT angiography. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12: S11 -S15.
7Setty BN, Sahani DV, Ouellete-Piazzo K, et al. Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-stiee MDCT. Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006, 30: 818-822.
8Sekiguchi R, Nawano S, Satake M, el at. Muhislice CT of the thorax: effects of contrast material pushed with saline solution using a dual power injector on contrast material dose and perivenous artifacts. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 2001, 61 : 484-490.
9Haage P, Sehmitz-Rode T, Hubner D, et al. Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax. AJR, 2000, 174: 1049 -1053.
10Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, et al. Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery, disease. AJR, 2002, 179 : 1545-1550.
