期刊文献+

货币政策公告、不确定性与人民币汇率变动 被引量:5

Monetary Announcements,Policy Uncertainty and RMB Exchange Rate Dynamic
原文传递
导出
摘要 货币政策公告是投资者判断货币政策走向的重要依据。文章基于2012年5月至2020年7月在岸和离岸人民币兑美元汇率数据,实证分析了外汇市场在货币政策公告发布前后几日的较短窗口区间内的市场反应。实证结果表明,M2公告和MPR报告发布前几天,在岸人民币兑美元收益率显著上升,在岸外汇市场存在关于M2公告和MPR报告的"预公告溢价效应",离岸外汇市场只存在关于MPR报告的"预公告溢价效应","预公告溢价"是对投资者额外承担政策不确定性风险的溢价补偿;MPR报告发布后投资者调整人民币资产头寸,在岸和离岸人民币汇率出现"公告后溢价效应";进一步考察"811汇改"的影响,发现只有在"811汇改"后,当市场力量的作用凸显时,在岸人民币汇率关于M2公告的"预公告溢价"显著为正。文章认为中国应该提高货币政策公告的规律性并推进系统性和前瞻性的制度设计。 Our study examines the performance of China’s onshore and offshore currency market in the short windows around the central bank PBOC’s related announcements.We document that there is a"pre-announcement premium effect"on the M2 announcement and the MPR report in the onshore currency market,and only the MPR report in the offshore foreign exchange market.In the offshore foreign exchange market,there is only the"pre-announcement premium effect"on the MPR report.We interpret these excess returns as compensation for monetary policy uncertainty.However,the release of the MPR report also impacts foreign currencies’excess returns by affecting financiers’balance sheets,leading to what we call a"post-announcement"effect.We examined the impact of the"811 exchange rate reform"and found that after the"811 exchange rate reform",the pre-announcement premium for the onshore RMB exchange rate was significantly positive.
作者 范小云 张潇 王博 Fan Xiaoyun;Zhang Xiao;Wang Bo
出处 《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第9期3-14,M0002,共13页 World Economy Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金重大专项“我国债务危机风险的防范治理与有效缓解对策研究”(项目编号:18VFH007) 国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于结构化数据分析的中国金融系统性风险防范体系研究”(项目编号:17ZDA074) 国家自然科学基金“外部冲击对中国金融稳定的影响机理:不确定性与公共事件冲击视角”(项目编号:72073076)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献88

  • 1黄学军,吴冲锋.离岸人民币非交割远期与境内即期汇率价格的互动:改革前后[J].金融研究,2006(11):83-89. 被引量:140
  • 2戴国强,梁福涛.中国金融市场基准利率选择的经验分析[J].世界经济,2006,29(4):3-11. 被引量:113
  • 3赵华.人民币汇率与利率之间的价格和波动溢出效应研究[J].金融研究,2007(03A):41-49. 被引量:104
  • 4[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 5[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 6[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 7[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 8[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 9[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 10[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312

共引文献7933

同被引文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部