秦简牍“内”“冗”再辨

Re-discrimination of Nei(内)and Rong(冗)in Qin Bamboo Slips

本文通过分析"内""冗"在不同批次秦简牍中的形体特征,认为二者可能并没有经历形体完全一样没有任何区别特征的"同形不别"的阶段,二者之间其实是有区别特征的。"冗"写作"内"应该认为是一般的形近相混的讹误。■和■不能等同,前者只能释为"内"而后者则只能释为"冗",它们不能像某些学者所说的那样看作是"内""冗"所从分化的共同形体,也不能说它们既可作"内"也可作"冗"。

By analyzing the physical characteristics of Nei(内)and Rong(冗)in different batches of Qin bamboo slips,this paper holds that they may not have gone through the stage of identical shape without any distinctive features in which they are exactly the same,but in fact there are distinctive features between them.Rong(冗)writing Nei(内)should be considered as a general mistake of similar forms.■and■can not be equated,the former can only be interpreted as Nei(内)while the latter can only be interpreted as Rong(冗).They can not be regarded as the common writing form of differentiation of Nei(内)and Rong(冗),as some scholars have said,nor can they be either Nei(内)and Rong(冗).