清人兩種《補五代史藝文志》關係考論

On the Relationship Between the Two Kinds of Supplemented Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi(《補五代史藝文志》)in the Qing Dynasty

清代顧櫰三、宋祖駿分别撰有《補五代史藝文志》,二者内容卻高度雷同。宋《志》後出,但不言參考或承襲,實爲剽竊顧稿之故。通過對顧《志》現存版本的梳理,可知宋《志》舆顧《志》國圖本出自同一底本,並且《補遺》很有可能爲顧、宋之外的第三者所作。從文本上看,宋《志》抄襲顧《志》痕迹明顯、證據充分。宋氏對顧《志》亦有删改,除了訛誤增多外,也糾正了顧《志》中的部分錯誤。顧氏晚年的遭遇及身後家人狀況導致其書稿散失,也爲宋氏竊稿提供了客觀條件。結合宋氏的生平交遊,可以分析他獲得顧稿的可能途徑。

In the Qing Dynasty,two versions of Supplemented Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi were respectively authored by Gu Huaisan and Song Zujun.Though high levels of similarities can be found in these two versions,there were no acknowledgements of reference or adoption by Song,since his version appeared later than Gu’s.Through sorting out the existing editions of Gu’s Zhi,it can be known that Song’s Zhi and Gu's Zhi are from the same original edition,and the Supplement is likely to be written by a third party other than Gu and Song.Text collation shows plain evidence of Song’s plagiarism from Gu's version of Zhi.However,apart from omissions and mistakes in his plagiarism,Song also corrected mistakes made by Gu.Gu’s later years and the living conditions of his descendants led to the loss of his manuscripts,which provided the objective condition for Song’s plagiarism.Based on Song’s life experience and his acquaintanceship,this thesis tries to analyse possible ways of Song to get access to Gu's manuscripts.